VIRENDER KUMAR OHRI Versus UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. (W.P.(C) 341/2004)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · W.P.(C) 341/2004

Case Record

W.P.(C) 341/2004

VIRENDER KUMAR OHRI Versus UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS.

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH

W.P.(C)Writs Writ petitions Civil

25 PDF renditions· 25 distinct judicial orders· 23 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

VIRENDER KUMAR OHRI Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.. W.P.(C) 341/2004 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010154132004. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 23 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 6 August 2004 to 25 March 2025.

On 6 August 2004 the order records: List this matter before a Bench of which Hon'ble Mr. Justce S.B. Sinha is not a member on 13.8.2004.
On 29 November 2004 the order records: Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, we are of the opinion that this case rais es some issues of wider and far reaching implications, i.e., how the justice delivery system s hould be strengthened so that the cases can be expeditiously disposed of. Issue notice to the respondent No. 1 in the first instan
On 29 August 2005 the order records: The learned counsel for the petitioner assures to formulate the issues which may arise for consideration in this petition in the light of the order dated 29.11.2004. Let it be done in two weeks under copy to the learned Additional Solicitor General. List thereafter.
On 12 November 2013 the order records: After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered opinion that in this writ petition, all the States should also be heard along with Union of India, and therefore notice should be served on all the States before we pass any orders. Issue notice to all the States through their respective Chief Secr
On 18 February 2014 the order records: By order dated 12th November, 2013, this Court had directed to serve notice on all the States besides Union of India. By the order dated 12th November, 2013, we had also directed that along with the notice, a copy of the consolidated suggestions made by Mr. Prashant Bhushan, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, for
On 8 July 2014 the order records: The matter requires to be disposed of at the earliest considering the issues arising therein. Accordingly, the case is fixed on 7 th August, 2014 for final disposal.
On 13 August 2014 the order records: Heard Mr. Prashant Bhushan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ranjit Kumar, learned Solicitor General appearing for the respondent-Union of India. Since the issue raised in the instant writ petition is similar to the Writ Petition(Criminal) No. 310 of 2005 pending before Court No.1 presided over by Hon'ble the
On 25 March 2025 the order records: 1. The instant petition has been filed inter alia seeking with the following prayers: a) secure the presence of the Respondent No.3 and other accused persons to ensure the trial of the Respondent No.3 and other accused persons; and b) direct the Respondents to conduct the trial of Respondent No.3 and other accused pers

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

6 August 2004. List this matter before a Bench of which Hon'ble Mr. Justce S.B. Sinha is not a member on 13.8.2004.
13 August 2004. Adjourned by four weeks with liberty to the petitioner to amend the petition or file an additi onal affidavit.
29 November 2004. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, we are of the opinion that this case rais es some issues of wider and far reaching implications, i.e., how the justice delivery system s hould be strengthened so that the cases can be expeditiously disposed of. Issue notice to the respondent No. 1 in the first instan
29 August 2005. The learned counsel for the petitioner assures to formulate the issues which may arise for consideration in this petition in the light of the order dated 29.11.2004. Let it be done in two weeks under copy to the learned Additional Solicitor General. List thereafter.
13 October 2006. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court as this matter falls under 'Complete Category' as per office note dated 18.9.2006. (B.SUDHEEN DRA KUMAR) RE GISTRAR ns
2 February 2007. Deleted. (B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR) REGISTRAR ns
10 January 2008. Four weeks time is granted to the petitioner to give suggestions.
20 March 2009. Post in August, 2009, for final disposal.
12 November 2010. As prayed by the Solicitor General, put up after three weeks.
10 December 2010. Put up on April 28, 2011 for final disposal.
16 August 2012. Stand over. |(Neetu Khajuria) | |(Sharda Kapoor) | |Sr.P.A. | |
22 July 2013. | | |List the matter on Monday the 29th July, 2013. | | | |[KALYANI GUPTA] | |[SHARDA KAPOOR] | |
29 July 2013. | | |List the matter on 5th August, 2013. | | | |[KALYANI GUPTA] | |[SHARDA KAPOOR] | |
5 August 2013. | | |This matter be listed on a non-miscellaneous day in the first week of | |September, 2013. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner will compile the| |suggestions which can be considered by the Court. | | | |[KALYANI GUPTA] | |[SHARDA KAPOOR] | |
12 November 2013. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered opinion that in this writ petition, all the States should also be heard along with Union of India, and therefore notice should be served on all the States before we pass any orders. Issue notice to all the States through their respective Chief Secr
18 February 2014. By order dated 12th November, 2013, this Court had directed to serve notice on all the States besides Union of India. By the order dated 12th November, 2013, we had also directed that along with the notice, a copy of the consolidated suggestions made by Mr. Prashant Bhushan, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, for
8 July 2014. The matter requires to be disposed of at the earliest considering the issues arising therein. Accordingly, the case is fixed on 7 th August, 2014 for final disposal.
7 August 2014. List on 13th August, 2014.
13 August 2014. Heard Mr. Prashant Bhushan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ranjit Kumar, learned Solicitor General appearing for the respondent-Union of India. Since the issue raised in the instant writ petition is similar to the Writ Petition(Criminal) No. 310 of 2005 pending before Court No.1 presided over by Hon'ble the
26 November 2015. List the matter after two weeks, as prayed by learned counsel appearing for Union of India.
9 March 2016. Adjourned by four weeks. Permission is granted to file additional documents.
30 August 2017. List tomorrow the 31st August, 2017. (OM PARKASH SHARMA) (RAJINDER KAUR) AR CUM PS BRANCH OFFICER
25 March 2025. 1. The instant petition has been filed inter alia seeking with the following prayers: a) secure the presence of the Respondent No.3 and other accused persons to ensure the trial of the Respondent No.3 and other accused persons; and b) direct the Respondents to conduct the trial of Respondent No.3 and other accused pers
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Mr. Narinder Verma, Mr. Vishal Gupta, Mr. Sanjai Pathak, Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh, Mr. Anubhav Anand, Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Mr. Sumeet Sharma, Ms. Parul Kaur Majithia, Mr. Rajesh Kapoor, Mr. Rohit Kr. Singh, Mr. Rohit K. Singh Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Gopal Subramanium, Ms. Sushma Suri, Ms. Sunita Suri, Ms. Aruna Gupta, Mr. D.D. Kamath, Mr. A. Podar, Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, Mr. S.N. Terdal, Mr. Anand, Ms. Sadhana Sandhu, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Khanna, Mr. Keshav Thakur

Relief Sought & Granted

On 25 March 2025 the latest order on this record says: 1. The instant petition has been filed inter alia seeking with the following prayers: a) secure the presence of the Respondent No.3 and other accused persons to ensure the trial of the Respondent No.3 and other accused persons; and b) direct the Respondents to conduct the trial of Respondent No.3 and other accused pers

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Writs Writ petitions Civil

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 25 Mar 2025

Latest development

Latest recorded event 25 Mar 2025

Next hearing

22 Sept 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 23 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.