- 31 January 2020. List along with Contempt Petition No.1115/2019 in W.P. (Civil) No.910/2016.
- 20 February 2020. Contempt Petition [C] No.330/2020 in W.P.[C] No.121/2018 Issue notice. Personal appearance of the alleged contemnor(s) is dispensed with.
- 21 October 2021. Mr. R. Balasubramaniam, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents-contemnors, has submitted that different replies were filed in view of the different zones, which are subject matter of the present contempt petitions. It is contended that the direction of this Court was to regularise the Railway Porters to t
- 22 November 2021. The matter was called out twice, but no one has appeared on behalf of Union of India. Office Report dated 20.11.2021 indicates that in some of the matters, spare copies of the petition(s) have not been filed.
- 7 January 2022. Ms. Madhavi Divan, learned Additional Solicitor General shall produce the summary of each of the contempt petitions to facilitate the orders of each such petitions. All the contempt petitions be posted for hearing together on 14.02.2022.
- 14 February 2022. Ms. Priyanka Das, learned counsel for the respondents states that summary of all the cases has been prepared and filed in the Court. The same to be shared with the learned counsel for the petitioners. List the matters on 21.02.2022.
- 21 February 2022. List on 07.03.2022.
- 7 March 2022. Contempt Petition (C) No.73/2022 in W.P.(C) No. 312/2020 & Contempt Petition (C) No.74/2022 in W.P.(C) No. 796/2020: Issue notice.
- 16 May 2023. Learned counsel for the respondent(s) submits that her statement, as indicated by this Court through the order dated 21.03.2023, has been filed. Registry to verify and put the same. Learned counsel for the respondent(s) to ensure that all the learned counsel for the petitioners have a copy of the same. The learned coun
- 4 September 2023. Learned Attorney General submits that an affidavit indicating the manner in which the judgment has been implemented, has been filed. Learned counsel for the respondents may look into the same and file their response, if any. The categorization of the cases shall also be indicated based on the manner in which the implem
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Suyash Srivastava, Mr. Prashant Shukla, Mr. Girdhar Upadhyay, Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, Mr. Vinay Navare, Ms. Deeplaxmi Subhash Matwankar, Mr. Dinesh K. Garg, Mr. Abhishek Garg, Mr. Dhananjay Garg, Mr. R.P. Bansal, Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran, Mr. Rohit Advocates — Respondents: Mr. R. Bala, Mr. Deepak Goel, Mr. Rebello, Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, Ms. Madhvi Divan, Mr. Ayush Puri, Mr. Kamlendra Mishra, Ms. Vanshaja Shukla, Mr. Amrish Kumar, Ms. Manju Sharma, Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Ms. Manju Jetley
