VINOD KUMAR Versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA (Crl.A. 1480/2025)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · Crl.A. 1480/2025

Case Record

Crl.A. 1480/2025

VINOD KUMAR Versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

MS. GRACY L. BAWITLUNG

Crl.A.Quashing order Criminal appeals Delay

8 PDF renditions· 8 distinct judicial orders· 8 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

VINOD KUMAR Versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI). Crl.A. 1480/2025 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010341782024. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 8 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 2 September 2024 to 14 August 2026.

On 2 September 2024 the order records: 1. Delay condoned. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner has been convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the circumstances would clearly suggest that the petitioner had no intention to shoot the child (the deceased) and, if at all, the conviction shoul
On 24 March 2025 the order records: 1. Leave granted. 2. Trial court records be requisitioned.
On 1 May 2025 the order records: Sole respondent is duly represented. Scanned/Photocopies of High Court and Trial Court records have not been received.
On 29 July 2025 the order records: Sole Respondent is duly represented. Scanned/Photocopies of High Court and Trial Court records have not been received despite reminder. Issue D.O. Letter.
On 8 September 2025 the order records: Sole Respondent is duly represented. Scanned/Photocopies of High Court and Trial Court records have not been received despite D.O. Letter dated 02.08.2025.
On 28 October 2025 the order records: Sole respondent is duly represented. Scanned/Photocopies of the High Court and the Trial Court records have not been received despite reminders/D.O. letter via orders dated 01.05.2025, 29.07.2025 & 08.09.2025.
On 14 August 2026 the order records: Sole respondent has already filed counter affidavit. Scanned copies of High Court and Trial Court records have been received. Let the soft copies be provided to the Ld. Counsels for both the parties.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

2 September 2024. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that although the petitioner has been convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, the circumstances would clearly suggest that the petitioner had no intention to shoot the child (the deceased) and, if at all, the conviction shoul
14 November 2024. Re-list the special leave petition on 27th November, 2024.
24 March 2025. 1. Leave granted. 2. Trial court records be requisitioned.
1 May 2025. Sole respondent is duly represented. Scanned/Photocopies of High Court and Trial Court records have not been received.
29 July 2025. Sole Respondent is duly represented. Scanned/Photocopies of High Court and Trial Court records have not been received despite reminder. Issue D.O. Letter.
8 September 2025. Sole Respondent is duly represented. Scanned/Photocopies of High Court and Trial Court records have not been received despite D.O. Letter dated 02.08.2025.
28 October 2025. Sole respondent is duly represented. Scanned/Photocopies of the High Court and the Trial Court records have not been received despite reminders/D.O. letter via orders dated 01.05.2025, 29.07.2025 & 08.09.2025.
14 August 2026. Sole respondent has already filed counter affidavit. Scanned copies of High Court and Trial Court records have been received. Let the soft copies be provided to the Ld. Counsels for both the parties.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Manan Agarwal, Mr. Rajeev Kumar Gupta, Mr. Mayank Sarin, Mr. Divyansh Thakur, Mr. Joginder Mann, Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Neeraj Agarwal, Mr. Ananya Kumar, Mr. Vinay Kumar, Mr. Gowardhan Prasad Tiwari, Mr. Sudip Lodh, Mr. Nishant Anand Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Vikramjeet Banerjee, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, Mr. Pranay Ranjan, Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Mr. V. V. V. Pattabhi, Mr. Praneet Pranav, Ms. Nidhi Rai, Ms. Mani Munjal, Mr. Bhav Ratan, Mr. Praneent Pranav, Mr. Ashiwan Mishra, Mr. Sushil Raja

Relief Sought & Granted

On 14 August 2026 the latest order on this record says: Sole respondent has already filed counter affidavit. Scanned copies of High Court and Trial Court records have been received. Let the soft copies be provided to the Ld. Counsels for both the parties.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Quashing order Criminal appeals Delay

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 14 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 14 Aug 2026

Next hearing

8 Sept 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 8 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.