- 14 September 2020. Issue notice. Having heard Shri Tushar Mehta, learned Solicitor General appearing for the appellant, we are of the view that the demand for a sum of Rs.9,00,00,000/-(Rupees Nine Crores) dated 06.08.2020 should be stayed for the present.
- 16 March 2021. Respondent Nos. 9,10 and 22 are yet to be served. Two weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps. Service is complete on behalf of other respondents. Learned counsel for the appearing respondents who have not filed the counter affidavit, shall file the same within four weeks' t
- 20 April 2022. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to respondent No. 9 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the appellant within a period of two weeks. Service is complete on behalf of other respondents. Ld.
- 20 July 2022. The office report indicates that Respondent Nos. 3 to 6 have already filed the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 1, 7, 11 to 14, 16, 18 to 20, 22 and 24 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
- 7 July 2023. 1. As per the office report dated 15th May, 2023, there is a delay of four days on the part of the learned counsel for the appellant in filing of the spare copies, due to which notice could not be issued. 2. On oral request, the delay is condoned.
- 25 August 2023. Respondent Nos. 3 to 6 have already filed the counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for respondent Nos. 2, 8, 15, 17, 21 and 23 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules.
- 18 October 2023. Four weeks time, as last chance is granted to appearing respondents to file the counter affidavit, if not already filed. Appellant has failed to file fresh particulars and to take fresh steps to effect service on all the unserved respondents, though last chance was granted.
- 4 January 2024. The case is listed for default on the ground that the appellant has not filed fresh particulars to effect service on the unserved respondents. Today, learned counsel for the appellant contends that the unserved respondents are the proforma parties. However, no such application is on record. As prayed, we grant two week
- 18 March 2024. IA No. 52138/2024 Learned counsel for the applicant seeks for deletion of Respondent Nos.1, 2, 5, 9, 17, 23, 24, 32, 42, 62, 63, 84, 85, 92, 94, 95, 104, 105, 115, 127 and 131. They are permitted to be deleted at the risk and cost of the appellant. It is also made clear that any order that would be passed in these proc
- 5 April 2024. Respondent nos.1, 2, 5, 9, 17, 23, 24, 32, 42, 62, 63, 84, 85, 92, 94, 95, 104, 105, 115, 127 and 131 have been deleted vide order dated 18.3.24 passed by Hon'ble Judge in Chambers. As per office report, respondent nos.4, 13, 19, 28, 38, 45, 48, 50, 65, 68, 87, 90, 100, 107, 108, 110, 118, 119 and 121 have failed to fi
- 11 July 2024. Respondent nos.88 and 108 have not filed counter affidavit despite last and final opportunity, hence further opportunities declined. Respondent nos.8, 11, 12, 26, 27, 46, 58, 66, 76, 80, 99, 109, 122 and 124 have already filed counter affidavit.
- 29 August 2024. Common respondent No.1 is granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. Respondent No.3 has filed counter affidavit.
- 21 October 2024. Despite service of notice on respondent No. 2, there is no appearance. Respondent No.3 has already filed counter affidavit.
- 27 January 2025. Post the matters on 18.03.2025 (NMD).
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Tushar Mehta, Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Mr. Sudhanshu Prakash, Mr. Gaurav, Mr. Vikas Maini, Ms. Nishtha Kumar, Ms. Rakhi, Mr. Vaibhav Sabharwal, Ms. Neha Jain, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tripathi, Mr. Vinaykas Pandit, Mr. Adarsh Tripathi Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Chirag Joshi, Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, Mr. Arjun Garg, Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Ms. Anuradha Mishra, Mr. Harmeet Singh Ruprah, Mr. Suraj Singh, Mr. Pradeep Misra, Mr. Ashish Prasad, Ms. Mukta Dutta, Mr. Kaushtubh Mishra, Mr. Rajesh J. Adv.
