- 21 November 2022. Leave granted. No stay.
- 2 May 2023. C.A No. 952/23 Respondent no.1 is duly represented. Despite due service on respondent no.2, there is no appearance.
- 6 July 2023. Delay condoned. Applications seeking exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing O.T. are allowed.
- 17 July 2023. Delay condoned. Application for exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment is allowed.
- 19 July 2023. IA NO. 93658/2023 & 134201/2023 IN C.A. No. 8827/2022 Not to be deleted from the date notified, i.e.
- 24 July 2023. IA Nos. 134201/2023,93658/2023 IN C.A. NO. 8827/2022 Issue notice. Learned counsel for MHADA (Mumbai Housing and Area Development Authority and the respondent Corporation seeks to file reply. The reply be filed within two weeks.
- 21 August 2023. Learned counsel for the appellants states that he requires six weeks' time to pay the principal amount. Let the amount be paid. If the amount is paid, the issue of interest will be examined by us.
- 6 September 2023. Application for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment is allowed. Delay is condoned subject to deposit of Rs.10,000/- with the Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister's Relief Fund within four weeks.
- 6 October 2023. Delay condoned. Application for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment is allowed.
- 31 October 2023. It is stated by learned counsel for the appellants that out of the principal amount, payment of Rs. 5.87 crores is left to be paid and they require two weeks to make such payment. The said statement is taken on record. We have already stated in our order dated 21.08.2023 that the issue of interest will be examined by u
- 5 December 2023. IA No. 134201/2023 ,IA No. 93658/2023 IN C.A. NO. 8827/2022 Learned counsel for respondent No. 1 seeks some time to verify whether the payment has been made or not.
- 13 December 2023. Learned counsel for the respondent(s) seeks to urge arguments on an application which is not on record. Let him get it placed on record. List in the reopening week after the winter recess.
- 2 January 2024. Delay condoned. Issue notice and tag with Civil Appeal No. 8826 of 2022 titled “Vikhroli Saikrupa Coop. Housing Society Ltd. and Anr. v. Mumbai Housing Area Development Authority and Ors.” In the meanwhile, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties, the development charges, without interest, will b
- 6 May 2024. 1. Permission to file SLP is granted. 2. Issue notice.
- 6 September 2024. Mr. A. S. Bhasme and Mr. Sanjay Singh, learned senior counsel, jointly submit that this matter is wrongly tagged with Civil Appeal No. 8826 of 2022.
- 14 October 2024. It has been submitted by Ld. counsel appearing for appellant No.2 that vakalatnama has already been filed on behalf of the said appellant. Submission be taken on record. Registry to verify and update the records. Respondent No.1 is duly represented.
- 6 November 2024. No. 9313/2022, C.A. No. 9311/2022, C.A. No. 9314/2022 Learned counsel for the appellants seeks and is granted two weeks' time to file the spare copies. Upon the needful being done, let process be issued to the unserved respondents.
- 6 December 2024. No. 9313/2022, C.A. No. 9311/2022, C.A. No. 9314/2022 Learned counsel for the appellants seeks and is granted finally three weeks' time to file spare copies in C.A. No. 2435/2023, C.A. No.2467/2023 and C.A. No.9313/2022.
- 27 January 2025. Learned counsel for appellant prays for and is granted four weeks time to comply the earlier order passed by this Court. List the matter after four weeks.
- 6 March 2025. Learned counsel for the appellant(s) prays for and is allowed three weeks' time to provide spare copies in Civil Appeal Nos. 2435 amd 2467 of 2023 for enabling issuance of notice.
- 1 April 2025. Learned counsel for the appellants prays for and is granted four weeks time to file spare copies. (GEETA JOSHI) (VINOD KUMAR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
- 23 May 2025. 1. Delay of one day in filing spare copies is condoned. 2. Registry to proceed accordingly.
- 30 July 2025. Respondent No.1 is duly represented. Service is complete on respondent No.2 but none has entered appearance.
- 9 September 2025. Respondent No.1 is duly represented. Service on respondent Nos.2 and 3 is complete as per service report received from the concerned High Court still none has entered appearance.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Arvind Gupta, Mrs. Suman Sharma, Mr. Ashish Kumar Singh, Mr. Arun Kumar Tiwari, Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, Ms. Mithu Jain, Mr. Sidharth Acharya, Mr. Arun Panickar, Mr. Ravi Kant Purohit, Ms. Sonali, Ms. Devika, Mr. Abhishek Bharti Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Ms. Nivedita Nair, Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Mr. Ashish Wad, Mrs. Tamali Wad, Mr. Sidharth Mahjan, Mr. Ajeya Sharma, Mr. Shailendra P. Singh, Mr. Rishabh Shivhare, Mr. K.K.venugopal, Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari
