- 6 December 2024. During the course of the hearing, on a suggestion given by this Court, the learned counsel for the parties, on instructions, state that the parties would like to explore the possibility of settlement and, therefore, Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, former Judge of this Court, may be appointed as a Mediator. In view of t
- 28 February 2025. It is stated that the mediation is still in progress. Re-list in the week commencing 28.04.2025.
- 2 May 2025. Mediation is still in progress. Re-list in the week commencing 11.08.2025.
- 22 July 2025. The matter is taken on Board. List on 29.07.2025.
- 29 July 2025. The matter is adjourned. The dominant group in the appellant No. 1-company shall prove its bonafides by taking necessary steps in terms of the order dated 01.04.2022 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, which stood confirmed by the impugned order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal.
- 9 September 2025. We find that, pursuant to the earlier order dated 29.07.2025, the parties have endeavoured to act upon the directions of the National Company Law Tribunal in its order dated 01.07.2022. However, it is stated that there are certain issues, which require to be resolved. In that context, the appellant shall furnish all in
- 8 October 2025. Adjournment is sought, by way of a letter circulated by the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2, on the ground that 63 documents have now been filed by way of an interlocutory application, which need to be examined. Accepting the request, the matter is adjourned.
- 12 November 2025. Re-list on 19.11.2025. In the meanwhile, learned counsel for the parties shall ascertain as to whether the parties are willing to have an administrator appointed for the purpose of running the company pending the hearing of this matter. They shall also indicate the issues in relation to which a forensic audit would hav
- 19 November 2025. Delay condoned. Issue notice, returnable on 25.03.2026.
- 10 February 2026. Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 1 (Caveator) and 3, if any, be filed by 24.02.2026. If the same is filed, it be taken on record.
- 27 February 2026. List this application on 10.03.2026. (BABITA PANDEY) (PREETI SAXENA) AR-cum-PS
- 10 March 2026. The grievance raised by way of this application is that M/s. Kalyaniwalla & Mistry LLP, 2 nd floor, Esplanade House, 29, Hazarimal Somani Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001, which was appointed as a forensic auditor by this Court, vide order dated 19.11.2025, is quoting a professional fee which is not to the liking of the CA
- 25 March 2026. Adjournment is sought, by way of a letter circulated by the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2, to enable him to file a counter affidavit/reply. Accepting the request, the matter is adjourned.
- 25 May 2026. Learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 seeks some more time to file a counter affidavit. CA No. 14192/2025 Needful shall be done within four weeks from today.
- 20 August 2026. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks time to file rejoinders to the counter affidavits filed by the respondents. CA No. 14192/2025 Needful shall be done by the next date of hearing.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Shyam Diwan, Ms. Mallika Joshi, Mr. Suhaas Ratna Joshi, Mr. Rogon Chaudhary, Ms. Charanjeet Sidhu, Mr. Arijit Prasad, Mr. Akhil Sibal, Ms. Nistha Mittal, Ms. Nishtha Mittal, Mr. Krishnesh Bapat, Mr. Amit Sibal, Ms. Malika Joshi Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Sanjiv Puri, Mr. Hemant Sethi, Mr. Kunal Cheema, Mr. Gaurav, Mr. Rahul Pawar, Mr. Shubham Chandankhede, Ms. Kirti, Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Mr. Shyam Mehta, Mr. Gaurav Sethi, Mr. Arijit Prasad, Mr. Chirag M. Shroff
