- 15 February 2019. Delay condoned. Issue notice.
- 4 April 2019. Service is complete qua respondent Nos.2 & 3 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. As per postal tracking report qua respondent No.1, notice has been received back undelivered. Ld.counsel for the petitioner shall, within a period of four weeks, file the fresh particulars of the above respondent and he shal
- 21 October 2019. IA- 114076/2019 is rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks and is granted four weeks' time to file an application for substituted service to serve Respondent No.1.
- 22 November 2019. Appearance: Ld. Counsel is present on behalf of petitioners. Ld. Counsel is present on behalf of respondents.
- 30 January 2020. Service is complete upon respondent No. 2, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Four weeks' time as a last chance is granted to Respondent No.
- 16 September 2022. Despite due service, none appears on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2.
- 13 April 2023. Mr. Rajeev Maheshwaranand Roy, counsel for the petitioner has appeared through video conferencing but there is some technical problem, as a result, his voice is not audible. Let matter be listed again after two weeks.
- 4 September 2023. At the request of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the matter is adjourned for four weeks. Learned counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that needful will be done to delete respondent no.4 from the array of parties.
- 14 February 2024. The learned counsel for the applicant(s)/petitioners invited my attention to the ground stated in the application for deletion of respondent No. 4. Considering the ground raised in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer at the risk of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners to take
- 10 April 2024. The matter is already directed to be listed before the Hon'ble Court. Respondent No.4 has been deleted from the array of parties.
- 31 July 2024. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 24 July 2025. List the matter on 12.08.2025.
- 18 August 2025. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. One of the legal issues arising in this matter is whether a person employed in merchant navy as an officer and drawing salary in the accounts maintained in India is exempt from payment of income tax. In the event, he is exempted from payment of tax, the Tribunal ought not to
- 21 January 2026. Service was complete on respondent nos. 1 and 2 on 15.12.2029 and 06.03.2019 respectively but none has entered appearance. Respondent no. 3 is duly represented.
- 23 August 2026. The dispute between the parties was referred for settlement before the Special Lok Adalat. However, no settlement could be arrived at in the Special Lok Adalat.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Dr. Surender Singh Hooda, Mr. Rajeev Maheshwaranand Roy, Mr. P. Srinivasan, Mr. Aditya Hooda, Mr. Nishant Yadav, Mr. Aayushman Aeron, Mr. Gagan Gupta, Mr. Nilesh Kumar Advocates — Respondents: Mr. P. Srinivasan, Mr. Rajeev Maheshwaranand Roy, Mr. Gagan Gupta, Mr. Nilesh Kumar
