VALLIVALAM DESIKAR POLYT.COL.EDU. Versus V.D.POLYTECHNIC EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY (REG NO 49/69) ONLY C.A. NO. 591-593 OF 2024 IS TO BE LISTED (C.A. 586/2024)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 586/2024

Case Record

C.A. 586/2024

VALLIVALAM DESIKAR POLYT.COL.EDU. Versus V.D.POLYTECHNIC EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY (REG NO 49/69) ONLY C.A. NO. 591-593 OF 2024 IS TO BE LISTED

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Education

69 PDF renditions· 69 distinct judicial orders· 23 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

VALLIVALAM DESIKAR POLYT.COL.EDU. Versus V.D.POLYTECHNIC EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY (REG NO 49/69). C.A. 586/2024 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010229392010. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 23 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 4 September 2017 to 7 August 2026.

On 4 September 2017 the order records: Application for deletion of the name of Respondent No.2 from the array of parties is allowed at the risk of the petitioner(s). (RASHI GUPTA) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER
On 4 January 2018 the order records: The respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit. The respondent No.2 has been deleted from the array of parties by order dated 04.09.2017 of the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber.
On 30 November 2018 the order records: Ld. Counsel for respondent No. 3 in SLP(C) No. 38065/2012 and Respondent No. 5 in SLP(C) No. 38066/2012 have not filed any counter affidavit despite grant of last chance. ITEM NO.8 2 Ld. Counsel for respondent No. 3 in SLP(C) No. 38064/2012 and Respondent No. 1 in SLP(C) No. 38065/2012 has filed an application for dele
On 24 September 2024 the order records: Respondent No.2 has been deleted from the array of parties in terms of Hon'ble Court's order dated 04.09.2017. Respondent No.1 is duly represented.
On 13 December 2024 the order records: Respondent no.1 is duly represented. Service is complete on respondent nos.2 and 3. It has been submitted by Ld. Counsel that memo of appearance on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 3 have already been filed. As sought, two weeks time, is granted to Ld. Counsel to file vakalatnama.
On 31 July 2025 the order records: The instant matter has already been directed to be listed before the Hon'ble Court vide Ld. Registrar Court's order dated 24.09.2024. Service is complete on respondent No.2 but none has entered appearance.
On 5 May 2026 the order records: C.A Nos. 591/2024 and 592/2024 Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are duly represented. C.A No. 593/2024 Respondent Nos.3, 5 & 40 are duly represented.
On 7 August 2026 the order records: 1. In view of letter dated 07.05.2026 issued by the learned counsel for the appellant, I.A. No.171868/2023 is directed to be withdrawn at the risk of the appellant. 2. Time of four weeks is granted to learned counsel for the appellant to take necessary steps for effecting service on respondent No.3 in C.A. No.588/2024

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

4 September 2017. Application for deletion of the name of Respondent No.2 from the array of parties is allowed at the risk of the petitioner(s). (RASHI GUPTA) (TAPAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER
4 January 2018. The respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit. The respondent No.2 has been deleted from the array of parties by order dated 04.09.2017 of the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber.
15 March 2018. None appears on behalf of the petitioner(s). Two weeks' time, as a last opportunity, is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner(s) to comply with the office report dated 19.02.2018, failing which the unserved respondent nos. 1 and 3 in SLP(c) No. 1292/2013, respondent nos. 13 in SLP(c) No.1293/2013, respondent n
13 August 2018. The matter is already ordered to be listed before the Hon'ble Court as is evident from the previous order dated 04.01.2018 of this Court. ……..2 ITEM NO.21 -2 Registry is directed to process the matter for being listed before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
1 October 2018. Being complete matters, place the same before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. ITEM NO.20 2 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to respondent No.40 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of two weeks.
30 November 2018. Ld. Counsel for respondent No. 3 in SLP(C) No. 38065/2012 and Respondent No. 5 in SLP(C) No. 38066/2012 have not filed any counter affidavit despite grant of last chance. ITEM NO.8 2 Ld. Counsel for respondent No. 3 in SLP(C) No. 38064/2012 and Respondent No. 1 in SLP(C) No. 38065/2012 has filed an application for dele
28 January 2019. As prayed for, list the application before regular Court. (RACHNA) (SANTOSH KUMAR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
14 March 2019. Being complete matters, list the same before the Hon'ble Court with pending I.A.
8 May 2019. Matters are already ordered to be listed before the Hon'ble Court. Hence, Registry to list accordingly. ……….2 ITEM NO.6 -2 Ld.counsel for the respondent No.40 submits that he does not intend to file counter affidavit. Statement is taken on record.
29 July 2019. List the matter after four weeks on a non-miscellaneous day. In the meantime, learned counsel for the petitioner may remove the clerical mistakes.
18 November 2019. Matter is adjourned by three weeks.
14 January 2020. dated 15.03.2018 is allowed. Issue notice to the unserved respondents.
9 December 2021. In view of the request made on behalf of Petitioner(s) to adjourn the matters on personal ground, matters are adjourned. As prayed, list on a non misc. day in the third week of January, 2022.
18 January 2022. In view of letter circulated on behalf of Petitioner(s) to adjourn the matters on personal ground, matters are adjourned. As prayed, list after four weeks.
21 September 2022. List these matters before a Bench of which one of us (Hon.V.Ramasubramanian,J.)is not a member.
16 January 2024. Leave granted.
24 September 2024. Respondent No.2 has been deleted from the array of parties in terms of Hon'ble Court's order dated 04.09.2017. Respondent No.1 is duly represented.
13 December 2024. Respondent no.1 is duly represented. Service is complete on respondent nos.2 and 3. It has been submitted by Ld. Counsel that memo of appearance on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 3 have already been filed. As sought, two weeks time, is granted to Ld. Counsel to file vakalatnama.
25 April 2025. IA No. 25015/2018 IN CA NO. 587/2024 (@ C.A. NO. 587 590/2024): 1. This application has been filed on behalf of the respondent no.3 to seek deletion of respondent nos. 4 and 6 to 42 from the array of parties.
31 July 2025. The instant matter has already been directed to be listed before the Hon'ble Court vide Ld. Registrar Court's order dated 24.09.2024. Service is complete on respondent No.2 but none has entered appearance.
2 April 2026. Learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, seeks leave of the Court to withdraw IA No. 171937/2023. Accordingly, IA No. 171937/2023 is dismissed as withdrawn.
5 May 2026. C.A Nos. 591/2024 and 592/2024 Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are duly represented. C.A No. 593/2024 Respondent Nos.3, 5 & 40 are duly represented.
7 August 2026. 1. In view of letter dated 07.05.2026 issued by the learned counsel for the appellant, I.A. No.171868/2023 is directed to be withdrawn at the risk of the appellant. 2. Time of four weeks is granted to learned counsel for the appellant to take necessary steps for effecting service on respondent No.3 in C.A. No.588/2024
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. M.P. Parthban, Mr. Satya Mitra Garg, Mr. Sureshan P., Ms. Malavika Jayanth, Mr. Jayanth Muth Raj, Mrs. Malavika Jayanth, Mr. S. Nagamuthu, Mr. T. Harish Kumar, Mr. Nissan Ahmed, Mr. Anish R. Shah, Mr. Basava Prabu Patil, Mr. Nizhar Ahmed Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, Mr. C. K. Sasi, Mr. R. Sathish, Mr. Sureshan P., Mr. Jayanth Muth Raj, Mr. Satya Mitra Garg, Mr. S. Arun Prakash, Mr. Satya Mitra, Ms. Malavika J., Mr. M.p. Parthiban, Mrs. Malavika Jayanth, Mr. N. Roy

Relief Sought & Granted

On 7 August 2026 the latest order on this record says: 1. In view of letter dated 07.05.2026 issued by the learned counsel for the appellant, I.A. No.171868/2023 is directed to be withdrawn at the risk of the appellant. 2. Time of four weeks is granted to learned counsel for the appellant to take necessary steps for effecting service on respondent No.3 in C.A. No.588/2024

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Education

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 7 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 7 Aug 2026

Next hearing

25 Mar 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 23 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 27 other files in the folder were left out.