V. RAJU Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER (C.A. 123/2019)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 123/2019

Case Record

C.A. 123/2019

V. RAJU Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. GURMEET SINGH MAKKER

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

8 PDF renditions· 8 distinct judicial orders· 8 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

RAJU Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.. C.A. 123/2019 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010421312018. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 8 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 4 January 2019 to 15 December 2025.

On 4 January 2019 the order records: Exemption from filing C/C of the imppugned judgment granted. Issue notice on application for condonation of delay as also on civil appeal.
On 29 January 2019 the order records: Service is complete on respondent No.1 but none has entered appearance. Await service/track report in respect of respondent Nos.2 and 3.
On 22 April 2019 the order records: Learned counsel for the appellant sought for and is granted four weeks' time to take necessary steps for effecting service upon respondent Nos.2 and 3. IA No.8839/2019 This application has been filed seeking deletion of proforma respondent Nos.4 to 32 which is not opposed by other counsel.
On 24 July 2019 the order records: Application filed for Transposition be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber. Respondent Nos.4 to 32 have been deleted vide order dated In respect of respondent No.2, process in terms of Order IV Rule 18, Supreme Court Rules, 2013.
On 13 November 2019 the order records: IA is allowed. Office to proceed further. (PRADEEP RAWAT) (VIRENDRA MOHAN BHATNAGAR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER
On 31 March 2022 the order records: Ld. counsel for respondent no.1 submits that they have filed counter affidavit. Service of notice for alternative arrangement(counsel designated as Senior Advocate) is complete upon respondent no.2 but none has entered appearance.
On 15 December 2025 the order records: order, which is placed on file. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

4 January 2019. Exemption from filing C/C of the imppugned judgment granted. Issue notice on application for condonation of delay as also on civil appeal.
29 January 2019. Service is complete on respondent No.1 but none has entered appearance. Await service/track report in respect of respondent Nos.2 and 3.
22 April 2019. Learned counsel for the appellant sought for and is granted four weeks' time to take necessary steps for effecting service upon respondent Nos.2 and 3. IA No.8839/2019 This application has been filed seeking deletion of proforma respondent Nos.4 to 32 which is not opposed by other counsel.
24 July 2019. Application filed for Transposition be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber. Respondent Nos.4 to 32 have been deleted vide order dated In respect of respondent No.2, process in terms of Order IV Rule 18, Supreme Court Rules, 2013.
13 November 2019. IA is allowed. Office to proceed further. (PRADEEP RAWAT) (VIRENDRA MOHAN BHATNAGAR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER
31 March 2022. Ld. counsel for respondent no.1 submits that they have filed counter affidavit. Service of notice for alternative arrangement(counsel designated as Senior Advocate) is complete upon respondent no.2 but none has entered appearance.
12 December 2025. List on 15.12.2025 to be taken up immediately after the fresh cases are heard.
15 December 2025. order, which is placed on file. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Ms. Srishti Agnihotri, Ms. Sharon Mathew, Ms Nupur Raut, Mr. D.p. Singh, Ms. Tara Elizabeth Kurien, Ms. Anchal Kanthed, Ms. Sanjana Grace Thomas, Ms. Sadhana Madhavan, Ms. Kavana Rao Advocates — Respondents: Mr. V. Ramasubramanian, Mr. Nikhil Nayyar, Mr. Shyamal Kumar, Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, Mr. Vimal Pani, Mr Ramesh Thakur, Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Mr. Gargie Boss, Ms. Sunit Chaudhary, Mr. Raman Yadav, Ms. Chitrangda Rastvara, Ms. Mili Baxi

Relief Sought & Granted

On 15 December 2025 the latest order on this record says: order, which is placed on file. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

The court record marks the case disposed. These order files do not contain a sentence that states the appeal or petition was allowed or dismissed, so that result is not restated here.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 15 Dec 2025

Latest development

Latest recorded event 15 Dec 2025

Final disposition

DISPOSED

Important procedural note

Written only from 8 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.