V.M. ELANGOVAN Versus GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS Mr. Anil Kumar Mishra, Ld. Advocate & Mr. Ayush Negi, Ld. Advocate (Amicus Curiae) (W.P.(Crl.) 466/2025)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · W.P.(Crl.) 466/2025

Case Record

W.P.(Crl.) 466/2025

V.M. ELANGOVAN Versus GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS Mr. Anil Kumar Mishra, Ld. Advocate & Mr. Ayush Negi, Ld. Advocate (Amicus Curiae)

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

W.P.(Crl.)Writs Investigation Writ petitions Criminal

5 PDF renditions· 5 distinct judicial orders· 5 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

V.M. ELANGOVAN Versus STATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ANR.. W.P.(Crl.) 466/2025 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010426442017. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 5 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 24 February 2025 to 16 December 2025.

On 24 February 2025 the order records: 1. Mr. Anil Kumar Mishra and Mr. Ayush Negi, learned Amicus Curiea are granted two weeks time to file the Jail Petition. 2. List after two weeks.
On 25 April 2025 the order records: At the request of the learned amicus curiae, the matter is adjourned to 13.05.2025. (GEETA JOSHI) (MAMTA RANI) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
On 23 September 2025 the order records: Even in the second call, none is present. List the matter after six weeks.
On 16 December 2025 the order records: The grievance of the petitioner, V.M. Elangovan, is that his case is not being considered for premature release/remission, in terms of the Tamil Nadu Prison Rules, 20241. We find that a detailed procedure has been prescribed in that regard under Rules 345 to 353 of the 2024 Rules.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

24 February 2025. 1. Mr. Anil Kumar Mishra and Mr. Ayush Negi, learned Amicus Curiea are granted two weeks time to file the Jail Petition. 2. List after two weeks.
25 April 2025. At the request of the learned amicus curiae, the matter is adjourned to 13.05.2025. (GEETA JOSHI) (MAMTA RANI) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
13 May 2025. List after two weeks.
23 September 2025. Even in the second call, none is present. List the matter after six weeks.
16 December 2025. The grievance of the petitioner, V.M. Elangovan, is that his case is not being considered for premature release/remission, in terms of the Tamil Nadu Prison Rules, 20241. We find that a detailed procedure has been prescribed in that regard under Rules 345 to 353 of the 2024 Rules.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Anil Kumar Mishra, Mr. Ayush Negi, Mr. Chaitanya Pandey, Ms. Aarushi Gupta

Relief Sought & Granted

On 16 December 2025 the order records: Granting liberty to the petitioner to do so, the writ petition is dismissed.

Subjects

Writs Investigation Writ petitions Criminal

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 16 Dec 2025

Latest development

Latest recorded event 16 Dec 2025

Final disposition

Granting liberty to the petitioner to do so, the writ petition is dismissed.

Important procedural note

Written only from 5 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.