USHA DEVI AND ORS. Versus JAGDISH (DEAD) AND ORS. AJAY PAL [R-1], [CAVEAT], APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT SUBSTITUTION FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ABATEMENT (C.A. 2361/2018)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 2361/2018

Case Record

C.A. 2361/2018

USHA DEVI AND ORS. Versus JAGDISH (DEAD) AND ORS. AJAY PAL [R-1], [CAVEAT], APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT SUBSTITUTION FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. ABATEMENT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. ANJARIA

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

17 PDF renditions· 17 distinct judicial orders· 12 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

USHA DEVI & ORS. Versus JAGDISH (DEAD) & ORS.. C.A. 2361/2018 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010325612016. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 12 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 25 August 2017 to 23 September 2025.

On 25 August 2017 the order records: Perused the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the respondent(s) seeking time to file reply. Four weeks' time is granted for filing reply.
On 9 October 2017 the order records: In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the respondents seeking adjournment for filing reply, list after two weeks.
On 27 October 2017 the order records: Respondent No. 2, being a proforma respondent, the service may be treated as complete. Counter Affidavit be filed within four weeks.
On 19 January 2018 the order records: In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the respondents seeking adjournment due to personal difficulty, list after two weeks.
On 28 August 2018 the order records: Service is complete. Learned counsel for the parties have not filed statement of case within the prescribed period.
On 22 June 2023 the order records: In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the appellants seeking an adjournment on the ground of personal difficulty of the arguing counsel, let the matter be listed on (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR
On 13 May 2025 the order records: Respondent Nos. 2 to 7 are duly represented. Ld. Counsel for the Respondent has filed an application for substitution in respect of deceased respondent No.1, which is defective. Four weeks time is granted to cure the defects.
On 23 September 2025 the order records: Heard learned counsel for the parties. Delay of 825 days in filing the application for setting aside abatement is condoned. Abatement is set aside. It is pointed out by learned counsel that the legal heirs of the deceased Respondent No.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

25 August 2017. Perused the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the respondent(s) seeking time to file reply. Four weeks' time is granted for filing reply.
9 October 2017. In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the respondents seeking adjournment for filing reply, list after two weeks.
27 October 2017. Respondent No. 2, being a proforma respondent, the service may be treated as complete. Counter Affidavit be filed within four weeks.
4 January 2018. Adjourned by two weeks.
19 January 2018. In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the respondents seeking adjournment due to personal difficulty, list after two weeks.
19 February 2018. Leave granted.
12 July 2018. Await certificate of service in respect of respondent No.4 from the concerned High Court. List the matter again on 28.08.2018.
28 August 2018. Service is complete. Learned counsel for the parties have not filed statement of case within the prescribed period.
22 June 2023. In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the appellants seeking an adjournment on the ground of personal difficulty of the arguing counsel, let the matter be listed on (SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR
20 September 2023. As requested on behalf of the respondents, list the matter after four weeks.
13 May 2025. Respondent Nos. 2 to 7 are duly represented. Ld. Counsel for the Respondent has filed an application for substitution in respect of deceased respondent No.1, which is defective. Four weeks time is granted to cure the defects.
23 September 2025. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Delay of 825 days in filing the application for setting aside abatement is condoned. Abatement is set aside. It is pointed out by learned counsel that the legal heirs of the deceased Respondent No.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. S.S. Khanduja, Mr. Shiv Kumar T., Ms. Hardeep Kaur, Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Mr. S. S. Khanduja, Ms. Rohini, Mr. S. S. Khanuja, Dr. P.V. Nandan, Mr. Pratyush Nandan, Mr. Shiv Kumar Tiwari, Mr. Harsh Saxena, Ms. S. S. Khanduja Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Gurinder Singh Gill, Mr. Ajay Pal, Mr. P.P. Nayak, Ms. Bhupinder, Mr. P. P. Nayak, Mr. Gurinder Singh, Ms. Vandana M. Hooda, Mr. Kuldeep Singh, Mr. Kuldeep Singh Kuchaliya

Relief Sought & Granted

On 23 September 2025 the latest order on this record says: Heard learned counsel for the parties. Delay of 825 days in filing the application for setting aside abatement is condoned. Abatement is set aside. It is pointed out by learned counsel that the legal heirs of the deceased Respondent No.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 23 Sept 2025

Latest development

Latest recorded event 23 Sept 2025

Next hearing

10 Sept 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 12 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 2 other files in the folder were left out.