UNISYS INFOSOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED Versus HAYRE ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED AND ORS. (ARBIT.PETITION 69/2025)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · ARBIT.PETITION 69/2025

Case Record

ARBIT.PETITION 69/2025

UNISYS INFOSOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED Versus HAYRE ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED AND ORS.

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE V. MOHANA · HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI

ARBIT.PETITION Appellate relief Contractual Obligations Delay Taxation

10 PDF renditions· 10 distinct judicial orders· 10 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

UNISYS INFOSOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED Versus HAYRE ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED & ORS.. ARBIT.PETITION 69/2025 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010458352025. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 10 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 26 September 2025 to 14 August 2026.

On 26 September 2025 the order records: 1. Delay condoned. 2. Issue notice, returnable in four weeks.
On 27 October 2025 the order records: 1. Issue notice on the application for intervention/impleadment as well as on the Arbitration Petition. 2. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted.
On 19 November 2025 the order records: ARBIT.PETITON No. 69/2025 Respondent nos. 1 to 3 are served through Email, but none has entered appearance. Let the matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.
On 8 January 2026 the order records: ARBIT.PETITON Nos. 70 and 71/2025 Service is complete on Respondent No. 2 but none has entered appearance. Service is complete on respondent No.1 and not complete in respect of Respondent No.3.
On 3 February 2026 the order records: ARBIT. PETITON Nos. 70 and 71/2025 In both the matters numbered above, s ervice is complete on respondent No.2, but none has entered appearance. Learned counsel, who appeared for respondent nos. 1 and 3 on last date of hearing, has not filed vakalatnama and counter affidavit, despite undertaking.
On 25 February 2026 the order records: Arbitration Petition Nos. 70 And 71 Of 2025 In both the matters numbered above, As per office report, Ld. Counsel who has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 on 08.01.2026 & 03.02.2026 has not filed vakalatnama.
On 27 February 2026 the order records: ARBIT.PETITON No. 70 and 71/2025 Learned counsel who appeared on 08.01.26, 03.02.26 and 25.02.26, has not filed vakalatnama in respect of respondent nos. 1 and 3, despite undertaking. However, service is complete on respondent nos. 1 and 3 through e-mail. Today, none appeared.
On 14 August 2026 the order records: 1. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 seeks and is granted two weeks time to file counter affidavit. 2. The other contesting respondents have not been served. Let they be served through dasti mode.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

26 September 2025. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Issue notice, returnable in four weeks.
27 October 2025. 1. Issue notice on the application for intervention/impleadment as well as on the Arbitration Petition. 2. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted.
19 November 2025. ARBIT.PETITON No. 69/2025 Respondent nos. 1 to 3 are served through Email, but none has entered appearance. Let the matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.
8 January 2026. ARBIT.PETITON Nos. 70 and 71/2025 Service is complete on Respondent No. 2 but none has entered appearance. Service is complete on respondent No.1 and not complete in respect of Respondent No.3.
3 February 2026. ARBIT. PETITON Nos. 70 and 71/2025 In both the matters numbered above, s ervice is complete on respondent No.2, but none has entered appearance. Learned counsel, who appeared for respondent nos. 1 and 3 on last date of hearing, has not filed vakalatnama and counter affidavit, despite undertaking.
25 February 2026. Arbitration Petition Nos. 70 And 71 Of 2025 In both the matters numbered above, As per office report, Ld. Counsel who has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 on 08.01.2026 & 03.02.2026 has not filed vakalatnama.
27 February 2026. ARBIT.PETITON No. 70 and 71/2025 Learned counsel who appeared on 08.01.26, 03.02.26 and 25.02.26, has not filed vakalatnama in respect of respondent nos. 1 and 3, despite undertaking. However, service is complete on respondent nos. 1 and 3 through e-mail. Today, none appeared.
11 May 2026. List on 15.05.2026.
15 May 2026. List on 14.08.2026.
14 August 2026. 1. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 seeks and is granted two weeks time to file counter affidavit. 2. The other contesting respondents have not been served. Let they be served through dasti mode.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Nikhil Chawla, Mr. Shivank Pratap Singh, Ms. Priya Singh, Ms. Mansha Mehta, Ms. Arshiya, Mr. Samyak Jain, Ms. Arshiya Chauhan, Mr. Priyanshu Maheshwari Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Shreshtah Raj Shrivastava, Mr. Bankey Bihari, Mr. Himanshu Dagar, Mr. Kartikeya Gautam, Dr. Ajay Kumar, Mr. Atul Singh, Mr. Manish Basista, Mr. Nitish Kumar Mishra

Relief Sought & Granted

On 14 August 2026 the latest order on this record says: 1. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 seeks and is granted two weeks time to file counter affidavit. 2. The other contesting respondents have not been served. Let they be served through dasti mode.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Contractual Obligations Delay Taxation

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 14 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 14 Aug 2026

Next hearing

19 Nov 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 10 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.