UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. XVII [P-2], [P-3], [P-4] Versus OMBIR SINGH UPADHYAY THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT (C.A. 3557/2025)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 3557/2025

Case Record

C.A. 3557/2025

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. XVII [P-2], [P-3], [P-4] Versus OMBIR SINGH UPADHYAY THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

98 PDF renditions· 98 distinct judicial orders· 15 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Versus NC ISAAC (RETD.). C.A. 3557/2025 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010052732024. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 15 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 1 March 2024 to 24 August 2026.

On 15 April 2024 the order records: Issue notice on the application seeking condonation of delay as well as on the Civil Appeal. List alongwith Civil Appeal Dy.No.5273/2024.
On 26 April 2024 the order records: 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants. 2. Leave to appeal under Section 31(1) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 is granted.
On 18 July 2024 the order records: C. A. D. NO. 5273, 9284, 12356, 13676 and 13680 OF 2024 Despite due service on the sole respondent, there is no appearance. C. A. D. NO. 3865 OF 2024 Sole respondent is duly represented. Ld. Counsel appearing for sole respondent seeks for time to file counter affidavit. Four weeks time, is granted for the said purpose.
On 20 May 2026 the order records: 1. Leave to Appeal U/S 31(1) Of The Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 is granted. 2. Issue notice on the Special Leave Petition(s)/Civil Appeal(s) as well as on the application for condonation of delay, returnable on 03.08.2026.
On 3 August 2026 the order records: 1. Learned Attorney General submits that the petitioners do not want to press the aforesaid Special Leave Petitions. 2. In view of the statement, the Special Leave Petitions stand dismissed as not pressed.
On 17 August 2026 the order records: 24890/2025, Diary No(s). 9281/2026, Diary No(s). 4008/2026, Diary No(s). 10366/2026, Diary No(s). 1482/2026, Diary No(s). 24005/2026, The above matters be detagged from the present batch of matters and be listed after the decision in SLP (C) No. 3680 of REST OF THE MATTERS 1. Heard learned Attorney General appearing fo
On 18 August 2026 the order records: present batch of matters and be listed after the decision in SLP (C) No. 3680 of 2025. REST OF THE MATTERS 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length.
On 24 August 2026 the order records: [Item No. 26.2] Detag these matters from the present batch of matters and be listed after the pronouncement of the Judgment in SLP (C) No. 3680 of 2025 (& Batch) REST OF THE MATTERS 1. Heard learned Attorney General for India and learned counsel appearing for the parties at length. 2. Arguments concluded.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

1 March 2024. Delay condoned. Issue notice.
15 April 2024. Issue notice on the application seeking condonation of delay as well as on the Civil Appeal. List alongwith Civil Appeal Dy.No.5273/2024.
26 April 2024. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants. 2. Leave to appeal under Section 31(1) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 is granted.
18 July 2024. C. A. D. NO. 5273, 9284, 12356, 13676 and 13680 OF 2024 Despite due service on the sole respondent, there is no appearance. C. A. D. NO. 3865 OF 2024 Sole respondent is duly represented. Ld. Counsel appearing for sole respondent seeks for time to file counter affidavit. Four weeks time, is granted for the said purpose.
27 August 2024. The matters are adjourned for two weeks. (INDU MARWAH) (NIDHI WASON) AR-cum-PS
17 September 2024. Adjourned by four weeks.
22 October 2024. List alongwith the batch of matters concerning disability pension after two weeks. (INDU MARWAH) (NIDHI WASON) AR-cum-PS
24 February 2025. 1. Diary No(s). 17944/2024(53.7) detagged. 2. Appeals admitted.
20 May 2026. 1. Leave to Appeal U/S 31(1) Of The Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 is granted. 2. Issue notice on the Special Leave Petition(s)/Civil Appeal(s) as well as on the application for condonation of delay, returnable on 03.08.2026.
3 August 2026. 1. Learned Attorney General submits that the petitioners do not want to press the aforesaid Special Leave Petitions. 2. In view of the statement, the Special Leave Petitions stand dismissed as not pressed.
10 August 2026. For further arguments, list on 17.08.2026 at 2 p.m.
17 August 2026. 24890/2025, Diary No(s). 9281/2026, Diary No(s). 4008/2026, Diary No(s). 10366/2026, Diary No(s). 1482/2026, Diary No(s). 24005/2026, The above matters be detagged from the present batch of matters and be listed after the decision in SLP (C) No. 3680 of REST OF THE MATTERS 1. Heard learned Attorney General appearing fo
18 August 2026. present batch of matters and be listed after the decision in SLP (C) No. 3680 of 2025. REST OF THE MATTERS 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length.
19 August 2026. List tomorrow (i.e., on 20.08.2026) at 3 p.m.
24 August 2026. [Item No. 26.2] Detag these matters from the present batch of matters and be listed after the pronouncement of the Judgment in SLP (C) No. 3680 of 2025 (& Batch) REST OF THE MATTERS 1. Heard learned Attorney General for India and learned counsel appearing for the parties at length. 2. Arguments concluded.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Ms. Sonali Jain, Mr. Abhishek Kumar Pandey, Mr. Kartikey Aggarwal, Mr. Raman Yadav, Mr. Arun Kr Yadav, Dr. N. Visakamurthy, Mr. Tushar Mehta, Mr. Mayank Pandey, Mr. Abhishek Kr Pandey, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Ajit Kakkar, Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Mr. Siddharth Narang, Mr. Puru Mudgil, Mr. Aditya Puar, Ms. Sushma, Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Mr. D.B. Yadav, Mr. Mukesh Kr. Maroria

Relief Sought & Granted

On 3 August 2026 the order records: Learned Attorney General submits that the petitioners do not want to press the aforesaid Special Leave Petitions. 2. In view of the statement, the Special Leave Petitions stand dismissed as not pressed.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 24 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 24 Aug 2026

Next hearing

23 Apr 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 15 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 83 other files in the folder were left out.