- 5 November 2012. Four weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the parties to file statement of case. | (GEETA AHUJA) | |(HARJINDER KAUR) | |SR.P.A | |
- 24 September 2013. Appellant has not filed the statement of case though time was granted by the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber by order dated 5.11.2012. The respondent has filed the statement of case. List the matter before the Hon'ble Court with an office report indicating the non filing the statement of case by the appellant.
- 17 June 2016. Since a request for adjournment was made on behalf of learned counsel for the appellant, the matter could not be taken up. Not to be listed during summer vacation.
- 12 June 2018. At the request of the learned counsel appearing for the respondent, let the matters be listed immediately after reopening.
- 15 April 2019. This is an application for early hearing of the appeal. List the appeal in the month of September, 2019 before the appropriate Bench.
- 14 November 2019. As prayed, list after two weeks. In the meanwhile, additional documents, if any, be filed.
- 25 October 2021. The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. Heard learned counsel appearing for the sole respondent.
- 1 December 2021. At the request of the learned counsel for the parties, list the matter on 25.01.2022. Parties may submit written synopsis a week before the date fixed for hearing.
- 25 January 2022. In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the respondent, list the matter after two weeks. (SHRADDHA MISHRA) (RENU BALA GAMBHIR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
- 5 April 2022. List after two weeks.
- 28 April 2022. Learned senior counsel for the appellants points out that the judgment reported in ' Union of India & Ors. Vs. Mohd. Aslam & Ors. (2001) 1 SCC 720 relied upon by the High Court has since been over-ruled by this Court in judgment reported in ' R.R. Pillai (Dead) Through Lrs. Vs. Commanding Officer, Headquarters Southern
- 20 July 2022. The learned counsel for the respondent seeks four weeks' time to argue the matter. List after four weeks.
- 20 July 2023. As prayed on behalf of the respondent, list this matter on 9th August, 2023.
- 9 August 2023. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 10 August 2023. On the request made by Shri R. Basant, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent, list the matter on 06.09.2023.
- 14 September 2023. IA No. 178325/2023is allowed. 2. The impugned order passed by the High Court of Delhi dated 2nd April, 2009 dismissed the writ petition of the Union of India, affirming the order passed by the Tribunal, on the ground that it was covered by a Two Judge Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Mohd. Aslam titled 'Unio
- 5 December 2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to the order dated 14 th September, 2023 of this Court in issue regarding maintainability of the Writ Petition against the Unit Run Canteen has been referred to larger Bench. Leave granted.
- 27 July 2026. As per office report, ld. Counsel for the appellant has not filed spare copies for issuance of notice of lodgment of petition of appeal in respect of respondent nos. 1 to 4 in terms of Hon'ble Court's order dated 05.12.2025. Today more time is sought. Hence, one weeks time as last opportunity is granted to file the sam
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. H.K. Naik, Mrs Anil Katiyar, Mr. Surender Kumar Gupta, Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Mr. Vikramjeet Benerjee, Mr. S.K. Gupta, Mr. Sarthak Raizada, Mr. M.K. Maroria, Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Ms. Madhavi Divan, Ms. Kiran Suri Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Arvind Kumar Shukla, Mr. Nihal Ahmad, Mr. Sweta Rani, Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Mr. Alok Shukla, Mr. Nihal Ahamad, Mr. Kunal Yadav, Mr. Arvind Shukla, Ms. Reetu Sharma, Ms. Neena Shukla, Mr. Amit Kumar, Mr. Shantanu Shukla
