- 4 January 2021. Issue notice both on the application for condonation of delay as well as on Special leave Petitions. In the meanwhile, there shall be stay on contempt petition(C)No.2023 of 2019 in W.P.(C)No.26447 of 2016 in Madras High Court.
- 4 February 2022. In terms of Hon'ble Court's Order dated 04.01.2021, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner shall file correct spare copies within a period of one week. Thereafter, notice be issued.
- 9 March 2022. As per the last order of Ld. Registrar 04.02.2021, the petitioner was required to file proof of service of the pleadings. The same be done within 10 days as last opportunity for issuance of notice to all the respondents through Ms. Priya Aristotle, Advocate, who has alraedy filed vakalatnama for all the respondents. Th
- 22 April 2022. Four weeks time, as a last chance, is granted to respondent nos. 1 to 45 to file counter affidavit. After the expiry of said period, matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
- 5 April 2023. Dr. Joseph Aristotle S., the learned counsel would refer to upgradation under the MACP scheme would cover about 46 respondents and the total financial implication for such financial upgradation for the employer should not be more than Rs. 1.5 crores. The counsel would then submit that the respondents are employees in t
- 4 May 2023. In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the respondents seeking adjournment for filing the additional documents, the matter(s) stands adjourned by four weeks.
- 24 November 2023. The petitioners counsel submits that financial implication would not be limited to 1.5 crores covering 46 respondents and would be much higher. The counsel prays for and is granted four weeks time to file affidavit.
- 4 January 2024. Mr. Sachin Sharma, learned counsel representing Union of India prays for and is granted four weeks' time to file response on the financial implications in the event of relief being granted to the respondents. Since more parties have entered appearance as respondents after last order on 5.4.2023, the petitioners would g
- 2 February 2024. Delay condoned. IA No. 12930/2021 – application for direction is rejected.
- 11 November 2024. Ld. Counsel for Appellants has failed to file spare copies for issuance of Notice of Lodgement of Petition of appeal in respect of all the unserved respondents. Remaining respondents are duly represented.
- 18 December 2024. Respondent Nos. 1 to 39 & 41 to 48 are duly represented. Await service report from the High Court in respect of respondent Nos. 40 and 49.
- 21 February 2025. Respondent nos.1 to 39 and 41 to 48 are duly represented. Four weeks time, is granted to Ld. Counsel for the appellant to take appropriate steps with regard to deceased respondent nos.40 and 49.
- 15 April 2025. Respondent Nos.1 to 39 and 41 to 48 are granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for the appellant is granted four weeks' time to take appropriate steps in respect of deceased respondent Nos.40 and 49.
- 14 July 2025. Respondent Nos.1 to 39 and 41 to 48 are granted four weeks' time, as last opportunity, for filing counter contd…. affidavit. However, Ld. counsel appearing for respondent Nos.6, 9 and 13 has submitted that counter affidavit has already been filed on behalf of the said respondents but the same is not reflecting in the o
- 23 July 2026. IA Nos. 202124/2025, 202120/2025 and 202121/2025 Two weeks time, is granted to learned counsel for the appellant to cure the defects in the above said applications. Delay in takin fresh steps and filing fresh particulars in respect of respondent No.2 in C.A. No.1846/2024 and respondent Nos.4, 5, 15 and 38 in C.A. No.18
- 31 August 2026. 1. Permission to file the Special Leave Petition(s) is granted. 2. Delay condoned.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Sachin Sharma Adv, Ms. Indira Bhakarms Adv, Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Ms. Sudha Pal, Mr. UDAI BHAN SINGH, Ms. Indira Bhakar, Mr. Sachin Sharma, Mr. Annirudh Sharma Ii, Mr. Ishaan Sharma, Mr. K. M. Nataraj, Mr. Ishan Sharma, Mr. Anirudh Sarma Advocates — Respondents: Dr. Joseph Aristotle S., Ms. Priya Aristotle, Ms. Sneha, Dr. Joseph Aristotle, Mr. Shobhit Dwivedi, Ms. Vaidehi Rastogi, Mr. P.R. Kovilan Poongkuntran, Ms. Jubli Momalia, Mrs. Geetha Kovilan, Ms. Shubhi Bhardwaj, Mr. R. Nedumaran, Mr. P.R. Kovilan P.
