UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus ARUN MUKHERJEE AND ORS. RITWIK PARIKH [R-1], [R-2] (C.A. 2524/2026)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 2524/2026

Case Record

C.A. 2524/2026

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus ARUN MUKHERJEE AND ORS. RITWIK PARIKH [R-1], [R-2]

SH. APOORV SINGH

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

14 PDF renditions· 14 distinct judicial orders· 13 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Versus ARUN MUKHERJEE & ORS.. C.A. 2524/2026 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010471862025. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 13 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 4 September 2025 to 24 August 2026.

On 4 September 2025 the order records: 1. Petitioners challenge the judgment and order dated 18.03.2025 in W.P.C.T. No.39/2025 passed by the High Court at Calcutta, titled “Union of India & Ors. vs. Arun Mukherjee & Ors.”. 2. Delay condoned.
On 9 December 2025 the order records: 1. On the request made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the matter is adjourned. 2. List on 03.02.2026.
On 25 March 2026 the order records: Ld. Advocate, Mr. Arghya Mukherjee, appearing on behalf of Mr.Ritwik Parikh, Advocate-on-record has entered appearance for respondent No.11B on whom service was complete on 25.09.2025. Time has been sought to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit. As service was complete in September 2025, hence, last opportunity is g
On 29 April 2026 the order records: Respondent Nos.2 to 10, 12 and 14 to 16 are duly represented. Opportunity of the said respondents to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Service was complete on respondent No.11B on 25.09.2025. Ld. Advocate, Mr. Rajat K. Mittal, appearing on behalf of Mr. Ritwik Parikh, Advocate-on-record has entered appe
On 27 May 2026 the order records: 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted.
On 13 July 2026 the order records: Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed an application for substitution in respect of deceased respondent No.1 but contd.. the same is defective. As sought, Ld. Counsel for the appellant is granted two weeks' time to cure the defects.
On 13 August 2026 the order records: Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substitution in respect of deceased respondent No.1.However, Ld. Advocate, Mr. Rajat Mittal, appearing on behalf of Mr.Ritwik Parekh, Advocate-on-record submits that contd.. he will be appearing for some of the respondents.
On 24 August 2026 the order records: Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has filed a fresh application for substitution of the legal representatives of deceased respondent no.1 which is barred by 44 days but Ld counsel has not filed application for setting aside abatement. One weeks time is granted to do the needful.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

4 September 2025. 1. Petitioners challenge the judgment and order dated 18.03.2025 in W.P.C.T. No.39/2025 passed by the High Court at Calcutta, titled “Union of India & Ors. vs. Arun Mukherjee & Ors.”. 2. Delay condoned.
17 October 2025. 1. Three weeks time is granted to learned counsel for the petitioners to file rejoinder affidavit. 2. No further opportunity shall be afforded.
14 November 2025. List the matter on 25.11.2025. (KANCHAN CHOUHAN) (ANU BHALLA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
2 December 2025. List on 09.12.2025.
9 December 2025. 1. On the request made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the matter is adjourned. 2. List on 03.02.2026.
3 February 2026. 1. Leave granted. 2. Hearing expedited.
25 March 2026. Ld. Advocate, Mr. Arghya Mukherjee, appearing on behalf of Mr.Ritwik Parikh, Advocate-on-record has entered appearance for respondent No.11B on whom service was complete on 25.09.2025. Time has been sought to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit. As service was complete in September 2025, hence, last opportunity is g
29 April 2026. Respondent Nos.2 to 10, 12 and 14 to 16 are duly represented. Opportunity of the said respondents to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Service was complete on respondent No.11B on 25.09.2025. Ld. Advocate, Mr. Rajat K. Mittal, appearing on behalf of Mr. Ritwik Parikh, Advocate-on-record has entered appe
27 May 2026. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted.
24 June 2026. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Issue notice.
13 July 2026. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed an application for substitution in respect of deceased respondent No.1 but contd.. the same is defective. As sought, Ld. Counsel for the appellant is granted two weeks' time to cure the defects.
13 August 2026. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substitution in respect of deceased respondent No.1.However, Ld. Advocate, Mr. Rajat Mittal, appearing on behalf of Mr.Ritwik Parekh, Advocate-on-record submits that contd.. he will be appearing for some of the respondents.
24 August 2026. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has filed a fresh application for substitution of the legal representatives of deceased respondent no.1 which is barred by 44 days but Ld counsel has not filed application for setting aside abatement. One weeks time is granted to do the needful.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. S.D.Sanjay, Ms. Astha Singh, Ms. Akanksha Raj, Ms. Medha Trivedi, Ms. Mili Baxi, Mr. Merusagar Samantray, Mr. Amrish Kumar, Mr. S.D.sanjay, Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, Mr. Udit Dedhiya, Mr. Amit Sharma-b, Ms. Akansha Raj Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Sanjay Parikh, Mr. Ritwik Parikh, Ms. Kritika, Mr. Rajat, Mr. Arghya Mukherjee, Mr. Satwik Parikh, Ms. Heena Khatun, Mr. Maitreya, Mr. Laxman Dagor, Mr. Ankit Dagor, Mr. Rajat K. Mittal, Mr. Rajat K.mittal

Relief Sought & Granted

On 13 August 2026 the order records: Counsel for the petitioner, the said application is allowed to be withdrawn in respect of deceased respondent Nos.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 24 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 24 Aug 2026

Next hearing

25 Mar 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 13 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 1 other files in the folder were left out.