UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. PRAVEEN SWARUP[R-4], PERSON ON IA 1/2016 ARGUE IN PERSON (W.P.(C) 891/2016)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · W.P.(C) 891/2016

Case Record

W.P.(C) 891/2016

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. PRAVEEN SWARUP[R-4], PERSON ON IA 1/2016 ARGUE IN PERSON

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE

W.P.(C)Writs Writ petitions Civil

142 PDF renditions· 142 distinct judicial orders· 40 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

ARJUN GOPAL & ORS. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.. W.P.(C) 891/2016 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010371382016. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 40 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 1 May 2017 to 14 September 2023.

On 1 May 2017 the order records: Four weeks' time is granted to respondent Nos.3, 4 and 6 for filing counter affidavit. Item No.32 -2 The Ld. Advocate, Mr. Satish Kumar, appearing on behalf of Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Advocate-on-Record undertakes to file vakalatnama for respondent No.5. Be filed within two weeks. Counter affidavit be filed within
On 21 July 2017 the order records: Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.1,2 & 7, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. The respondent Nos.3, 4 & 6 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules.
On 5 March 2019 the order records: Insofar as the problem of crop/ stubble burning in the State of Punjab as well as the State of Haryana is concerned, the petitioner(s) had given certain suggestions on the last date of hearing which were taken note of. We direct these two States and the India Meteorological Department ("Met Department") to file their c
On 11 April 2019 the order records: We have heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Tamil Nadu Fireworks and Amorces Manufacturers' Association, the Union of India and other parties and perused the record. We have also heard Dr. Sadhana Rayalu, Chief Scientist & Head, Environment Materials Division, CSIR – National Environment Engineering
On 26 November 2019 the order records: We have perused the status report with reference to this Court's order dated 11.04.2019 on behalf of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC). In the conclusion part of the aforesaid report, it is stated as follows :
On 3 March 2020 the order records: Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners/applicants, has brought to our notice violations of our earlier order(s) banning the use of certain chemicals in the fireworks by the manufacturers. According to Mr. Sankaranarayanan, learned senior counsel, many of the respondents-manufac
On 29 September 2021 the order records: The present application is filed by the original writ petitioners making a grievance with respect to the violation of the various orders passed by this Court in Writ Petition (C) No.728/2015. It is not in dispute and it cannot be disputed that pursuant to the earlier orders passed by this Court use of barium and barium
On 14 September 2023 the order records: Heard learned learned senior counsel for the parties as also learned ASG at length. Arguments concluded.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

1 May 2017. Four weeks' time is granted to respondent Nos.3, 4 and 6 for filing counter affidavit. Item No.32 -2 The Ld. Advocate, Mr. Satish Kumar, appearing on behalf of Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Advocate-on-Record undertakes to file vakalatnama for respondent No.5. Be filed within two weeks. Counter affidavit be filed within
21 July 2017. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.1,2 & 7, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. The respondent Nos.3, 4 & 6 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules.
4 September 2017. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Advocate on record seeks time to file vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no. 1. Two weeks' time is given for filing vakalatnama and thereafter counter affidavit is to be filed within four weeks' time. Respondent nos. 2 and 7 to file counter affidavit within four weeks' time.
10 October 2017. Respondent Nos. 2, 3, 5 and 6 have already filed the counter affidavit. Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the respondent No.7 to file the counter affidavit.
28 November 2017. Respondent Nos. 2, 3, 5 and 6 have already filed the counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for the respondent Nos.4 and 7 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules.
11 January 2018. Service be effected on the unserved respondents. Pleadings be completed in the meanwhile.
25 January 2018. Respondent Nos. 3,4 and 6 have already filed the counter affidavit. Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the respondent No.5 to file the counter affidavit.
9 March 2018. Four weeks' time is granted to respondent No.1 for filing counter affidavit. The Ld. Advocate, Mr. M. Khairati, appearing on behalf of Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate-on-record submits that Mr.Arvind Kumar Sharma is appearing for respondent No.1 instead of Mr. G.S. Makkar, Advocate-on-record.
18 April 2018. WP(C) NO.899/2016 Respondent no.1 is granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit. Item No.23 Respondent nos. 2 and 8 have filed counter affidavit.
16 July 2018. List the matters tomorrow, i.e. on 17th July, 2018.
17 July 2018. List the matters on 19th July, 2018.
19 July 2018. At the request of learned counsel for the parties, post the matters on Wednesday, 1st August, 2018 at 2 p.m. along with all the pending applications. Union of India may file its affidavit within two days as Mr.
1 August 2018. Heard in part. List the matters on Wednesday, the 8th August, 2018 at 2 p.m.
8 August 2018. Heard in part. For further arguments, list the matters on 14.08.2018 at 2.00 PM (MUKESH KUMAR) (RAJINDER KAUR)
14 August 2018. Further arguments heard in these matters. Arguments have not been concluded.
21 August 2018. Reply affidavit filed by the Union of India is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
28 August 2018. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Arguments concluded.
23 October 2018. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
23 October 2018. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
11 December 2018. List for hearing on 22.01.2019. The respondents shall file their replies before the next date of hearing.
22 January 2019. List the matters on 29.01.2019. (SUSHIL KUMAR RAKHEJA) (VIDYA NEGI) AR CUM PS
20 February 2019. We are informed that some meetings took place between PESO, NEERI and some other agencies. We are also informed that NEERI has suggested new formulations and signed Memorandum of Understanding ("MoU") with the manufacturers. Mr. Arvind P. Datar, learned senior counsel, wants to place the copy of the MoU on record. Let
5 March 2019. Insofar as the problem of crop/ stubble burning in the State of Punjab as well as the State of Haryana is concerned, the petitioner(s) had given certain suggestions on the last date of hearing which were taken note of. We direct these two States and the India Meteorological Department ("Met Department") to file their c
12 March 2019. As prayed for, list the matters on 03.04.2019. (SANJAY KUMAR-II) (INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL)
3 April 2019. Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, learned counsel appearing for the Union of India, prays for and is granted one week's time to file affidavit on behalf of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) . List these matters on 11.04.2019.
11 April 2019. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Tamil Nadu Fireworks and Amorces Manufacturers' Association, the Union of India and other parties and perused the record. We have also heard Dr. Sadhana Rayalu, Chief Scientist & Head, Environment Materials Division, CSIR – National Environment Engineering
26 November 2019. We have perused the status report with reference to this Court's order dated 11.04.2019 on behalf of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC). In the conclusion part of the aforesaid report, it is stated as follows :
12 December 2019. List on 19.02.2020.
3 March 2020. Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners/applicants, has brought to our notice violations of our earlier order(s) banning the use of certain chemicals in the fireworks by the manufacturers. According to Mr. Sankaranarayanan, learned senior counsel, many of the respondents-manufac
28 September 2021. Heard in part. List tomorrow, i.e., on 29.09.2021,for further hearing.
The record also contains 10 further orders. Each file is listed on the Orders tab.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Rahul Gupta, Mr. Gagan Gupta, Mr. Anubhav Kumar, Mr. Rajat Kapoor, Ms. Vandana Sehgal, Mr. Manoj Swarup And Co., Mr. Deepak Jain, Mr. Shekhar Gupta, Mr. Anis Ahmed Khan, Ms. Rekha Giri, Mr. Ananta Prasad Mishra, Mr. R.K. Kapoor Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Neha Sangwan, Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Mr. Lokendra Kumar, Mr. Suvesh Kumar, Mr. Praveen Swarup, Ms. Kiran Bhardwaj, Mr. Vijay Panjwani, Ms. Vandana Sehgal, Mr. B. K. Pal, Mr. Satish Kumar, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Mrs. Sushma Verma

Relief Sought & Granted

On 14 September 2023 the latest order on this record says: Heard learned learned senior counsel for the parties as also learned ASG at length. Arguments concluded.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Writs Writ petitions Civil

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 14 Sept 2023

Latest development

Latest recorded event 14 Sept 2023

Next hearing

7 Oct 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 40 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 77 other files in the folder were left out.