UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OF FOREST ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ANR. (W.P.(C) 330/2011)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · W.P.(C) 330/2011

Case Record

W.P.(C) 330/2011

UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OF FOREST ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ANR.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI

W.P.(C)Writs Service matters Writ petitions Civil

319 PDF renditions· 319 distinct judicial orders· 33 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

CENTRAL ARECANUT MARKETING COPN.& ORS. Versus UNION OF INDIA. W.P.(C) 330/2011 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010223342011. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 33 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 12 August 2011 to 23 September 2016.

On 12 August 2011 the order records: Issue notice, returnable on 26.9.2011. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
On 3 May 2013 the order records: Perused office report dated 2.5.2013. The affidavits have been filed by the Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and Manipur Pollution Control Board in compliance of the directions given by the Court on 3.4.2013.
On 1 October 2013 the order records: Shri Prashant Bhushan and Shri R.S. Suri, made submissions on behalf of Health for Millions and Doctors for You. Both of them had filed intervention pursuant to the orders passed in the writ petitions filed by them. They relied upon the provisions contained in the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and the Food Safety
On 24 October 2013 the order records: During the pendency of S.L.P.(C) No.16308 of 2007 Ankur Gutka v. Indian Asthama Care Society and others and three connected matters, a number of writ petitions were filed which were heard with the special leave petitions.
On 31 October 2013 the order records: At the threshold of further hearing of the matters, Shri Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner in WP(C)No.289 of 2011 made a request that he may be allowed to address the Court. As requested by Shri Dwivedi, we took up WP(C)No.289 of 2011.
On 7 September 2016 the order records: In the first category of cases, heard the arguments of Mr. Subramanium Prasad, Mr. V. Shekhar and Mr. Pinaki Mishra, learned senior counsel for the respective parties. They have concluded their submissions. In the second category of cases under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and Regulations framed thereunder,
On 15 September 2016 the order records: In the second category of cases under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and Regulations, heard the arguments of Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Mr. P.P. Rao, learned senior counsel for the petitioners. Also heard the arguments of Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, learned senior counsel for the petitioners, in part. List for further hea
On 23 September 2016 the order records: These matters have been heard inter alia on 1.9.2016, 7.9.2016, 15.9.2016, 16.9.2016, 20.9.2016 and 21.9.2016. In the course of submissions by the learned counsel, it has been stated today that longer time will be required in completing the hearing as more submissions are to be made by many learned counsel representing

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

12 August 2011. Issue notice, returnable on 26.9.2011. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
26 September 2011. Perused the office report. Fresh notice be issued to respondent no.2 returnable in four weeks. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
31 October 2011. No request for filing counter affidavit. List before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
21 November 2011. Learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent requests and we allow his client four weeks' time to file copy of the common counter affidavit filed in other cases. List the case on 06.01.2012.
17 January 2012. Adjourned to 31.1.2012. [SUMAN WADHWA] [PHOOLAN WATI ARORA]
23 February 2012. These matters be listed for consideration after hearing in S.L.P.(C) No.15436 of 2009 along with connected cases and T.P.(Crl.) Nos.383-385 along with T.P.(Crl.) Nos.462-464 of 2011 and Writ Petition(Crl.) No. D16039 of 2011 and Writ Petition(Crl.) No. 146 of 2011 and S.L.P. (Crl.) No.1105 of 2012 is concluded.
23 April 2013. It appears from the perusal of the office report that in all these batch of matters, for want of process fee and spare copies, notices to the respondents could not be issued. The learned counsel for the petitioners to file the process fee and spare copies by 26.4.2013 and on compliance notices be issued forthwith throu
3 May 2013. Perused office report dated 2.5.2013. The affidavits have been filed by the Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and Manipur Pollution Control Board in compliance of the directions given by the Court on 3.4.2013.
27 September 2013. List the case on 1.10.2013. To be taken up as the first case.
1 October 2013. Shri Prashant Bhushan and Shri R.S. Suri, made submissions on behalf of Health for Millions and Doctors for You. Both of them had filed intervention pursuant to the orders passed in the writ petitions filed by them. They relied upon the provisions contained in the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and the Food Safety
4 October 2013. Further arguments of Ms. Indira Jaising, learned Additional Solicitor General heard. For completion of arguments, the case is adjourned to To be taken up at 2.00 p.m.
4 October 2013. Further arguments of Ms. Indira Jaising, learned Additional Solicitor General heard. For completion of arguments, the case is adjourned to To be taken up at 2.00 p.m.
7 October 2013. The cases are adjourned to 21.10.2013. To be taken up at 2.00 p.m.
21 October 2013. The cases are adjourned to 22.10.2013. To be taken up at 10.30 a.m.
21 October 2013. The cases are adjourned to 22.10.2013. To be taken up at 10.30 a.m.
21 October 2013. The cases are adjourned to 22.10.2013. To be taken up at 10.30 a.m.
22 October 2013. Mr. Gopal Subramanium, learned amicus, made his submissions, which remained inconclusive. For further arguments, list theses cases on 23.10.2013.
23 October 2013. Shri Gopal Subramanium, learned amicus, completed his submissions. Shri Vishnu Behari Tewari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Indian Dental Association also made his submissions.
24 October 2013. During the pendency of S.L.P.(C) No.16308 of 2007 Ankur Gutka v. Indian Asthama Care Society and others and three connected matters, a number of writ petitions were filed which were heard with the special leave petitions.
31 October 2013. At the threshold of further hearing of the matters, Shri Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner in WP(C)No.289 of 2011 made a request that he may be allowed to address the Court. As requested by Shri Dwivedi, we took up WP(C)No.289 of 2011.
13 November 2013. List these cases on 18.11.2013. To be taken up at 2.00 P.M.
18 November 2013. Not taken up.
25 November 2013. On a mention made by learned senior counsel for the parties, we direct that these petitions be listed on 29.11.2013. To be taken up along with W.P.(C)No.856 of 2013.
21 April 2016. List the matters after summer vacation. (SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) AR-CUM-PS
18 July 2016. List on 03.08.2016.
4 August 2016. Upon being mentioned by Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, learned senior counsel stating that they have received a communication from the Office of Mr. Gopal Subramanium, learned Amicus Curiae thereby requesting for an adjounrment on the ground that he is unwell. As prayed, the matters are adjourned by three weeks.
1 September 2016. Heard the arguments of Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in S.L.P.(C) No. 16314/2007 and Mr. Sanjai Kumar Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 354/2011 and T.C.(C) No. 95/2012. Also heard the arguments of Mr. Subramanium Prasad, learned senior coun
7 September 2016. In the first category of cases, heard the arguments of Mr. Subramanium Prasad, Mr. V. Shekhar and Mr. Pinaki Mishra, learned senior counsel for the respective parties. They have concluded their submissions. In the second category of cases under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and Regulations framed thereunder,
15 September 2016. In the second category of cases under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and Regulations, heard the arguments of Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Mr. P.P. Rao, learned senior counsel for the petitioners. Also heard the arguments of Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, learned senior counsel for the petitioners, in part. List for further hea
16 September 2016. In the second category of cases under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and Regulations framed thereunder, challenging prohibitory orders in the transferred cases, heard the arguments of Mr. Gopal Subramanium, learned senior counsel (amicus curiae) in part. List for further hearing on 20.09.2016 as part heard (1
The record also contains 3 further orders. Each file is listed on the Orders tab.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Ankur Saigal, Mr. Abhay Anand Jena, Ms. Bina Gupta, Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Mr. Suraj Govindraj, Mr. Ankur Saigl, Mr Abhay, Mr. Ajit Bhasme, Mr. Siddhartha Chowdhury, Mr. Subramonium Prasad, Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Mr. P.B. Suresh Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Mohan Jain, Mr. D.K. Thakur, Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Mr. S.N. Terdal, Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal, Mr. Brijender Chahar, Mr. Prashant Kumar, Mr. B.K.Prasad, Ms. A. Sumathi, Mr. P.V. Yogeswaran, Mr. Anil Kumar Jha, Mr. Ravi Kumar Tomar

Relief Sought & Granted

On 15 September 2016 the order records: ] : Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the transfer petition. Permission sought for is granted. The transfer petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Writs Service matters Writ petitions Civil

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 23 Sept 2016

Latest development

Latest recorded event 23 Sept 2016

Next hearing

7 Oct 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 33 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 214 other files in the folder were left out.