- 19 August 2014. File not received. List again on 3.11.2014.
- 5 November 2014. File not received. List again on 12.12.2014.
- 12 December 2014. The learned counsel for the appellants shall file the fresh particulars of the respondent No.1 within a period of four weeks'. He shall also take appropriate steps for the service of notice to him and to the respondent No.2 within the same period.
- 26 February 2015. Three weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of Order dated 12.12.2014 of this Court. List again on 7.5.2015.
- 7 May 2015. The office report is that although by order dated 26.02.2015 of this Court, four weeks time as last chance was given to the the Ld.counsel for the petitioners to comply with the terms of the order dated 12.12.2014 of this Court, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Therefore, the m
- 9 July 2015. Delay condoned. Issue notice in the application for leave to appeal.
- 28 August 2015. Learned counsel for the appellants undertakes to furnish fresh correct address of respondent No.1 within two weeks from today so as to enable the Registry of this Court to effect service upon respondent No.1. Since the instant matter was filed after a delay of more than one year and the notice was issued on 24.02.2014,
- 1 October 2015. Issue notice on the application for leave to appeal. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 2875 of 2014.
- 20 November 2015. Issue notice in the application for leave to appeal and also in the application for condonation of delay. Tag along with Civil Appeal NO.2875 of 2014.
- 21 January 2016. An application has been filed for deletion of performa respondent No.2. The application is allowed.
- 22 February 2016. Delay condoned. Issue notice on the application for grant of leave to appeal.
- 26 February 2016. Delay condoned. Issue notice.
- 7 April 2016. Fresh steps for the service of notice to the respondent No. 1 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the appellants within a period of four weeks. Item No.19 2 Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the appellants to comply with the terms of the order dated 17.2.2016 of this Court in res
- 13 April 2016. Issue notice. Tag with Civil Appeal No. 2875 of 2014.
- 5 July 2016. Ld.counsel for the appellant shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the respondent No.1 and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the same period. Ld.counsel for the appellant shall within a period of four weeks file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of
- 12 August 2016. The office report indicates that s ervice of notice is complete on the sole respondent but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules. Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for th
- 14 September 2016. Issue notice in application for condonation of delay and also in the application for leave to appeal. Tag along with Civil Appeal No.2875 of 2014.
- 26 September 2016. As per tracking report in respect of respondent No.1, the postal remarks shows that ⬠Sinsufficient address⬠\235. Ld.counsel for the appellant shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the above said respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the sam
- 26 September 2016. As per tracking report in respect of respondent No.1, the postal remarks shows that ⬠Sinsufficient address⬠\235. Ld.counsel for the appellant shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the above said respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the sam
- 8 November 2016. As per tracking report s ervice of notice is complete on the sole respondent but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.
- 7 December 2016. Ld. Counsel for the appellants has failed to file the fresh particulars and to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the respondent No.1 despite opportunities. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. Await orders. List th
- 25 January 2017. Three weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the appellants for taking steps for service upon unserved respondent, as prayed.
- 2 March 2017. Ld.counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substituted service in respect of the respondent No.1 and the same is allowed. Registry shall process the same as per rules/guidelines. List on 18.04.2017. In both matters, service of notice is complete on the sole respondent, but no one has entered appearance
- 18 April 2017. Ld.counsel for the appellant is directed to file the proof of paper publication in respect of the respondent No.1 within four weeks. List the matter on 17.07.2017.
- 5 September 2017. D 3743/2016 Being complete matters, place the same before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules. Item No.5 2 Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 1 to 5, 7 and 8 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
- 31 October 2017. These matters have already been directed to be listed before the Hon'ble Court. Hence, list accordingly. Await the return of service of notice already issued to the sole respondent.
- 20 November 2017. As a last chance, four weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the appellant to file proof of publication in respect of respondent no.1. respondent no.6 is allowed at the risk of the petitioner.
- 12 December 2017. C.A No.5717/2015: Respondent nos.1 to 5, 7 and 8 served but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
- 8 January 2018. The appellant has once again not filed proof of publication and the learned counsel for the petitioner is left holding the relevant document in hand. The proof of publication be filed subject to deposit of costs of RS.2,000/-(Rupees Two Thousand Only) with the Supreme Court Advocates-on-record Welfare Trust within two
- 12 February 2018. Delay in filing proof of publication of notice is condoned. Learned counsel for the appellants states that the proof of deposit of cost of Rs.2000/- has been filed.
- The record also contains 18 further orders. Each file is listed on the Orders tab.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, Mr. B.P. Nahar, Mr. Atul Guleria, Mr. Tushar Mehta, Ms. Vimla Sinha, Mr. Kabir Hathi, Mr. Sunil Mathews, Mr. Maninder Singh, Mr. Mohit Paul, Mr. B. Raghunath, Mr. Sanjiv Das, Ms. Rashmi Malhotra Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Naresh Ghai, Mr. U.s. Maurya, Mr. Naresh Kumar, Mr. US Maurya, Mr. N. K. Ghai
