UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. FOR FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 97596/2023 97598/2023 DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 207451/2023 (W.P.(C) 547/2023)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · W.P.(C) 547/2023

Case Record

W.P.(C) 547/2023

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. FOR FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 97596/2023 97598/2023 DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 207451/2023

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU

W.P.(C)Contempt Civil Contempt Writ petitions Civil

19 PDF renditions· 19 distinct judicial orders· 6 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

RAJ KUMAR Versus MANOJ SINGH & ANR.. W.P.(C) 547/2023 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010162812023. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 6 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 18 May 2023 to 16 February 2026.

On 16 February 2026 the order records: 1. Learned Single Judge of the High Court by an order dated 31 st October, 2017 has dismissed the contempt petition1. This order is under challenge in the special leave petition. 2. Paragraph 4 of the impugned order refers to a Government notification 1 CP No.4775/2017 dated 30th January, 2017.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

18 May 2023. Tag along with W.P.(C) No.626/2019.
1 September 2023. By consent, list these matters on 10.10.2023 (NMD).
24 November 2023. As prayed, list these matters on 16.01.2024 (NMD) (DEEPAK SINGH) (ANJU KAPOOR)
16 January 2024. By consent, list these matters on 27.02.2024 (NMD).
27 February 2024. As prayed, list these matters on 09.04.2024 (NMD).
16 February 2026. 1. Learned Single Judge of the High Court by an order dated 31 st October, 2017 has dismissed the contempt petition1. This order is under challenge in the special leave petition. 2. Paragraph 4 of the impugned order refers to a Government notification 1 CP No.4775/2017 dated 30th January, 2017.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. T. N. Singh, Mr. Vikas, Ms. Rajshree Singh, Mr. Vikas Kumar Singh, Mr. Raj Kumar, Dr. Sham Chand, Mr. S. N. Bhat, Mr. Kumar Gaurav Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, Ms. Sansriti Pathak, Mr. Krishnanand Pandeya, Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Ms. Alka Agarwal, Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Mr. Mukul Singh, Mr. Aman Sharma, Mr. Amit Shrama B., Mr. Amrish Kumar, Mr. P.N. Misra, Mr. S.r. Singh

Relief Sought & Granted

On 16 February 2026 the latest order on this record says: 1. Learned Single Judge of the High Court by an order dated 31 st October, 2017 has dismissed the contempt petition1. This order is under challenge in the special leave petition. 2. Paragraph 4 of the impugned order refers to a Government notification 1 CP No.4775/2017 dated 30th January, 2017.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Contempt Civil Contempt Writ petitions Civil

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 16 Feb 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 16 Feb 2026

Next hearing

3 Feb 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 6 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 13 other files in the folder were left out.