- 9 April 2021. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is granted one week's time to file proof of service of special leave petition upon the caveator. After ascertaining the compliance, the matter shall be processed for listing.
- 5 July 2021. 1 We have heard Mr Dhruv Mehta, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Dr Harsh Vir Pratap Sharma, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2 Mr Dhruv Mehta has assailed the correctness of the judgment of the High Court on the ground that:
- 5 January 2022. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have already filed the counter affidavit. Counsel for Appellant has on 26.10.2021 filed Application for Substituted Service by way of publication in respect of Respondent Nos. 3(a) to 3(d) and 4 to 7. The same is allowed.
- 14 February 2022. Counter affidavit has already been filed on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2. Service of notice is complete on the other respondents, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
- 9 July 2026. In view of letter circulated by the learned counsel for appellant, the matters stand adjourned for six weeks.
- 23 August 2026. 1. Heard Mr. Janendra Lal, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. 2. It is submitted that the settlement talks are still underway.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Janendra Lal, Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Ms. Yasmin Tarapore, Ms. Yasmine Tarapore, Mr. Sanjay Narain, Mr. Sunil Chopra, Mr. J.B. Singh Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Meera Kaura, Mr. Tejas Patel, Dr Harsh Vir Pratap Sharma, Dr. Harshvir Pratap Sharma, Mr. Akul Krishnan, Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Ms. Sakshi Apurva
