- 6 December 2019. Heard the learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Senior counsel appearing for Respondent No.1. Issue notice.
- 13 January 2020. Ld. counsel for the petitioner instead of filing spare copies in respect of respondent no.2 has filed letter dated 2.1.2020 mentioning therein that respondent no.2 is an offshore vessel. It is further mentioned that it was owned by Marine Engineering Diving Services which is a company incorporated under the relevant la
- 24 February 2020. Ld. counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for modification of Registrar Court's order dated 13.1.2020. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner pointed out that in order dated 13.1.2020 the Court in the third line mentioned as under “...It is further mentioned that it was owned by Marine En gineering Diving Service
- 27 July 2020. Opportunity to respondent no.1 to file counter affidavit has already been declined. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that ap plication for impleadment and application for dispensing with service in respect of respondent no.2 be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber for orders. Be listed accordingly.
- 20 November 2020. The applications to dispense with the service on Respondent No.2 and impleadment are allowed without prejudice to the contentions that can be raised by either of the parties during the course of hearing of the special leave petition. Ms. Diya Kapur, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.1 does not admit
- 8 March 2022. Respondent No.1 has not filed counter affidavit, despite grant of sufficient opportunity. Application for dispensing with service upon respondent No.2 was allowed vide order dated 20.11.2020 passed by the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers.
- 21 April 2022. Respondent no.1 has not filed counter affidavit despite being granted sufficient opportunities. Service upon respondent no.2 has been dispensed with vide order dt.20.11.2020 passed by the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers.
- 21 July 2022. Respondent no. 1 has not filed counter affidavit despite grant of sufficient opportunities. Service has been dispensed with in respect of respondent no.2 vide order dt.20.11.2020 of the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers.
- 5 September 2022. Respondent no.1 has not filed counter affidavit despite grant of sufficient opportunities Service upon respondent no.2 was dispensed with vide order dt.20.11.2020 passed by the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers. Service is complete on respondent no.3 but none has entered appearance.
- 2 February 2026. 1. Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is allowed three weeks' time to file counter affidavit. 2. List in the third week of March, 2026.
- 16 March 2026. 1. Leave granted. 2. List for hearing on 29.04.2026.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Mr. Sajan Poovayya, Mr. Amitara Majumdar, Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Mr. Ankur Saigal, Mr. Rohan Talwar, Ms. Ayushi Amodh, Mr. Shaishir, Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Mr. Ruchir Goenka, Ms. Damyanti Sen Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Prashant Pratap, Mr. Siddharth Dave, Mr. Vishal Muglikar, Mr. Kaushik S. Krishnamurthy, Ms. Diya Kapur, Mr. Raghav Anand, Mr. Rohan Poddar, Ms. Liz Mathew, Ms Diya Kapur, Mr Rohan Poddar, Mr Raghav Anand, Mr Navneet
