- 5 December 2023. 1. The judgment dated 29 th May, 2023 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi 1 partly allowing the Consumer Complaint2 filed by the appellants has been assailed by them on 1 For short 'NCDRC' 2 Consumer Case No.1913 of 2017 several grounds, two of them being that despite the fact that
- 6 January 2025. It has been submitted by the ld. Counsel for the petitioner that another tagged matter bearing Dy. No.27157 has not been listed today, being a tagged matter it was required to be listed. Registry to look into the matter and do the needful. Ld. Counsel, Mr Prakash Chandra appearing on behalf of Mr Manik Karanjawala, Adv
- 24 February 2025. Sole respondent has filed counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit has also been filed by the appellant.
- 17 April 2025. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed fresh particulars in respect of both respondents but after the passage of stipulated time. As per office report, due to the above reason notice could not be issued. On oral prayer of ld. Counsel for the petitioner, delay is condoned . Issue notice immediately. Respondent no. 1 (n
- 16 July 2025. Respondent no.1 is present in-person. Ld. counsel for the appellant is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of unserved respondent no.2.
- 22 August 2025. Ld. counsel for the appellant is granted two weeks' time as last opportunity to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of unserved respondent no.2. Respondent no.1-in-person has already filed reply.
- 8 October 2025. Respondent no. 1-in-person has filed reply. Service is complete on respondent no.2 but none has entered appearance.
- 9 January 2026. After hearing learned counsel for the parties for some time, we deem it appropriate that all the official bodies/regulatory bodies, which are required to act in the matter(s) relating to Electricity, Roads, Water supply and other amenities etc., are made party to the present proceedings. 2. Accordingly, learned counsel
- 15 January 2026. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Delay of 271 days in Civil Appeal Diary No. 14556 of 2024 and 354 days in Civil Appeal Diary No. 27157 of 2024 are condoned.
- 28 January 2026. 1. The delay in submitting the demand draft is condoned. 2. Let the same be taken on record.
- 18 February 2026. By order dated 15.01.2026, we had impleaded certain Authorities as party respondents. 2. It appears that the notice has been accepted on behalf of all those respondents No. 2 to 18 by the learned counsel for the State of Haryana on 22.01.2026.
- 25 February 2026. Heard learned senior counsel and counsel for the parties. 2. The respondent no.1-Mr. Rohit Bhayana in C.A. No.7984/2024 has also been heard.
- 30 April 2026. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Pursuant to our earlier order dated 25.02.2026, a status report has been submitted by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in a sealed cover. We have perused the same and the conclusion indicates that there have been misrepresentations by the developer to the Government Re
- 4 May 2026. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. On 30.04.2026, this Court had recorded the following order.
- 11 May 2026. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Mr. Saurabh Gupta, SP, CBI is also present in Court, in terms of our earlier order dated 04.05.2026. 2. The matter has been listed today after the Court had acceded to the request of learned counsel for the respondents to furnish a copy of the Status Report of the initial inquiry,
- 21 July 2026. The Primus Resident Condominium Association (hereinafter referred to as the 'PRCA') stands superseded with immediate effect and until further orders by this Court. The Commissioner of Police, Gurugram is directed to immediately take over the PRCA's premises and secure all its records/documents. The PRCA shall be admini
- 18 August 2026. Heard learned Senior Counsel/Counsel for the parties. 2. A Status Report dated 03.08.2026 has been submitted on behalf of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) by Mr. Saurabh Gupta, IPS, Superintendent of Police, CBI, who was entrusted with conducting an exercise in terms of the order of this Court dated 21.07.2026
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Ms. Abiha Zaidi, Ms. Suriti Chowdhary, Mr. Anuj Bhave, Mr. Udit Dedhiya, Mr. Naman Basoya, Mr. Anuj Manoj Bhave, Mr. Pritam Raman Giriya, Mr. Abhishek, Ms. Akanksha Thapa, Ms. Uzma Sheikh, Mr. Tribhuvan Narain Singh Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Uzma Sheikh, Mr. Aditya Pn Singh, Mr. Prakash Chandra, Ms. Suriti Chowdhary, Ms. Abiha Zaidi, Mr. Anuj Manoj Bhave, Mr. Pritam Raman Giriya, Ms. Akanksha Thapa, Mr. Abhishek, Mr. Tribhuvan Narain Singh, Ms. Seema Sundd, Mr. Ishank Jha
