- 19 February 2024. Issue notice, returnable within four weeks. In the meantime, there shall be stay of further proceedings in Case No. T.S. (DIVORCE) 218/2023 titled “Sri Kaushik Deb Vs. Smt.
- 30 July 2024. Ld. counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps in respect of unserved sole respondent. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has requested that in addition service may be permitted to be effected through publication.
- 17 September 2024. Ld. counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substituted service in respect of the sole respondent but the same is defective as per office report. Defects be cured within two weeks. List again on 04.10.2024.
- 4 October 2024. Sole respondent is granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. Ld. counsel for the petitioner has cured the defects in application for substituted service but application stands infructuous since respondent is represented now.
- 15 January 2025. Four weeks time, as last chance is granted to sole respondent to file counter affidavit. After expiry of four weeks, list the matter before the Hon'ble Court.
- 13 February 2025. 1. With the consent of both the parties, the matter is referred to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre. Parties to appear before the Mediation Centre on 21.02.2025 at 10.30 AM. 2. On the first date i.e. on 21.02.2025, the mediation may take place by virtual mode. Thereafter, the parties are ready to appear personally as
- 23 July 2025. In terms of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner, list after two weeks.
- 7 August 2025. 1) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the payment of Rs.20,50,000/- has been received and the balance of Rs.4,50,000/- is yet to be made. 2) For clearing the said balance, learned counsel for the respondent prays for and is granted six weeks' time.
- 24 September 2025. 1) Apropos previous order, joint a pplication under Article 142 of the Constitution of India seeking divorce by mutual consent has not been filed. As prayed, it be filed within two weeks. 2) The parties are directed to appear either in person or attend the proceedings virtually on the next date.
- 13 October 2025. 1) We have heard both the learned counsel and also the parties, who have joined virtually, and have also perused the terms of settlement placed on record. 2) As per the terms, visitation right of the petitioner and the respondent with children has not been specified.
- 31 October 2025. 1. The consensus for meeting of the child as indicated in the application (IA No. 274662 of 2025) filed by the parties appears to be unreasonable. In the interest of justice, we grant one more opportunity to the parties to rethink and file appropriate fresh application along with affidavit specifying the city and place
- 3 December 2025. In terms of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner, list on 19.12.2025.
- 19 December 2025. 1. The transfer petition stands disposed of in terms of the signed order. 2. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Kush Chaturvedi, Mr. Syed Faraz Alam, Mr. Atharva Gaur, Mr. Aayushman Aggarwal, Ms. Reshmi Rea Sinha, Mr. Rahul Pal, Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Ms. Sanjida Kausar, Ms. Sanjida Dausar Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Rajesh Sen, Mrs. Shibani Bhattacharjee, Mr. Kamal Pundir, Mr. Shaveer Ahmed, Mr. Abdullah, Mr. Shashi Kant Yadav
