- 28 January 2021. 1 Ms Anjoo Jain, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, submits that there are two conflicting decisions of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal on the issue as to whether the non-payment of rent would qualify as an operational debt within the meaning of Section 5(21) of the Insolvency and Bankrup
- 30 June 2021. Issue notice. Mr. A. V. Rangam, learned Advocate-on-Record, who appears on caveat, accepts notice on behalf of Respondent No. 1.
- 10 July 2024. Re-list for final hearing/disposal on a non-miscellaneous day in the week commencing 18.11.2024. It is stated that Promila Taneja v. Surendri Design Pvt. Ltd.,1 pending before this Court, raises a similar issue.
- 8 November 2024. Issue notice. To be heard along with C.A. No.4237/2020 and C.A. No.3857/2020 and other connected matters.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Anjoo Jain, Mr. Hitesh Sachaar, Ms. Prachie Jain, Mr. Anuj Bhandari, Mr. K. Rajendran, Mr. Saurabh Jain, Mr. Kaushik Poddar, Mr. Siddhartha Dave, Mr. Avijit Patnaik, Ms. Shuvra Mohapatra, Ms. Shreyan Das, Ms. Soma Patnaik Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Mr. Buddy A. Ranganadhan, Mr. A. V. Rangam, Mr. Sanjeev Sen, Mr. Gaurav Choudhary, Ms. Anjali Singh, Mr. Pragyan Mishra, Mr. Atanu Mukherjee, Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, Mr. Attin Shankar Rastogi, Mr. Archit Chauhan, Mr. Adil Vasudeva
