- 11 January 2013. Perused office report dated 06.11.2012. Both the parties have filed statement of case.
- 24 January 2013. No further steps required. The matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
- 2 July 2014. Four weeks time is granted to the ld. Counsel for the appellant for bringing on record the legal representatives. List again on 12.8.2014.
- 12 August 2014. Last opportunity is granted to the appellant for moving application for substitution or deletion of respondent Nos. 5,14,44 and 45 as they have expire d, according to the ld. Counsel for the responden t, Mr K.N.Rai. List again on 11.11.2014.
- 11 November 2014. The ld. counsel for the appellant to move separate application for deletion of respondent Nos. 14,44 and 45. Filing of Death certificate is condoned as counsel for the respondent has intimated the date of death and appellant has confirmed the factum of death from the concerned village. The ld. Counsel to cure the other
- 22 January 2015. The Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that he has already cured the defects in respect of the chamber summons. Registry to verify and process as per rules.
- 13 March 2015. An application has been filed for deletion of Respondent Nos. 6, 7 , 9, 12, 14, 23, 38, 39, 44 & 45 on the ground that they have died. The application is allowed. The name of the respondents is permitted to be deleted at the risk of the appellant.
- 21 April 2016. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps for effecting service of legal representative Nos. (i) to (iii) of deceased respondent No.5 within two weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued. (PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Hema Joshi Date: 2016.04.23 12:04:15 IST Reason:
- 3 October 2016. Pursuant to the order dated 13.03.2015 passed by the learned Chamber Judge, notices were issued to legal representative nos. (i) to (iii) of deceased respondent no. 5. According to the office report, service is complete in respect of said legal representatives, though no appearance has yet been filed.
- 9 October 2017. As per office report, service is complete. However, it is contended by the Ld.counsel for the respondent that there is an pending and not reflected in the office report. In case, such application is filed, and is in order, the same shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for orders. Await or
- 10 September 2018. The respondents have moved an application seeking various changes and amendments in the memo of parties of the respondents arising from the demise of the parties and certain legal heirs being left out. Learned counsel for the appellants state that considering the averments made in the application, the necessary changes
- 22 April 2019. Application has been filed with the request that under some wrong impression and inadvertently a request was made for deletion of the name of respondent No.39 who as per instructions died during pendency of proceedings but this fact appears to be factually incorrect. Taking note of the above, application has been filed
- 23 July 2019. Respondent No.16(a) is reported to be dead. Learned counsel for appellants shall within a period of four weeks file an application for substitution to bring on record his Lrs. Appellant Nos. 2 and 6 are unrepresented, hence the matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers.
- 27 January 2020. Four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the Appellants to comply with the office report dated (GEETA AHUJA) (ANAND PRAKASH)
- 4 March 2020. Having regard to the office report and considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellants, four weeks' time is granted to take necessary steps for filing vakalatnama on behalf of appellant Nos.2 & 6. Learned counsel for the appellant is also directed to take fresh steps against unserved responden
- 14 December 2020. Learned counsel for the appellants seeks for and is granted four weeks further time finally to file Vakalatnama on behalf of Appellant Nos. 2 and 6, to take fresh steps against the unserved respondents and to file application to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased Respondent No.16A failing which t
- 12 March 2021. substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of deceased respondent no. 16.1 is allowed. filing substitution application in respect of deceased appellant nos. 1.2 and 1.6 is allowed.
- 6 April 2021. Await Certificate of Service of Notice of Lodgment in respect of Respondent Nos. 15, 44 (A)(i) to 44(A)(iii), 44(B)(i) to 44(B)(iv), 44(C)(i) to 44(C)(x), 44(C)(xi)(a) to 44(C)(xi)(c) & 44(D)(i) to 44(D)(iii). At this stage, Ms. Neha Aggarwal Advocate submits that the name of previous counsel for appellant Ms. Shally B
- 14 March 2022. Respondent No. 44B(i) is reported to be dead. Learned counsel for appellant shall within a period of four weeks file an application for substitution to bring on record his Lrs. Learned counsel for appellant shall within a period of two weeks file the fresh particulars of unserved respondent Nos. 15, 44A(I) to 44A(iii),
- 27 April 2022. Despite opportunity granted on 14th March, 2022, steps have not been taken by learned counsel for petitioner. However, As prayed, four weeks time, as a last chance, is granted to learned counsel for petitioner, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars, to serve respondent Nos. 15, 44A(i) to 44A(iii), 44C(I) to 44
- 27 July 2022. Learned counsel for appellants has failed to comply with the terms of order dated 27.4.2022. On request of Ld. Counsel for appellants, three weeks time, as last and final opportunity is given to do the needful, failing which the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further dire
- 3 November 2022. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners is granted four weeks' time, as a last chance, to take fresh steps and/or file fresh particulars to serve unserved Respondents and file application for substitution to bring on record the proposed the legal representatives of deceased Respondents, as mentioned in the Office
- 10 February 2023. Despite opportunity, counsel for the appellants has neither filed fresh particular nor taken fresh steps to serve the unserved respondents and has also not filed application for substitution in respect of deceased respondent nos.1(4) and 44B(i). Consequently, the matter has not proceeded any further.
- 12 July 2023. Respondent No.36(A) is reported to have expired. Learned counsel for appellants shall within a period of four weeks file an application for substitution to bring on record his Lrs. Two weeks time, is granted to appellants, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars to issue notice of alternative arrangement to resp
- 24 August 2023. Four weeks time, as a last chance, is granted to Ld. counsel for the appellant to file application for substitution in respect of deceased respondent no.36(A). Two weeks time, is granted as a last chance to Ld. counsel for the appellant, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars, for issuance of notice of alternat
- 17 October 2023. Appearing respondents are granted four weeks time, as a last chance to file counter affidavit, if not already filed. Ld. counsel for the appellant has failed to file application for substitution in respect of deceased respondent no.36(A).
- 26 February 2024. List before another Hon'ble Chamber Judge.
- 5 March 2024. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the son of deceased respondent No. 36(A) is already on record as respondent No. 38(A) and as such he may be treated as legal representative of deceased respondent No. 36(A). The endorsement to that effect be made by the Registry in the cause title. Insofar as the service
- 24 October 2024. 1. As prayed, four weeks time is allowed to the learned counsel for the appellant to cure the defects pointed out by the Registry in the application for substitution and the application for condonation of delay. 2. List after four weeks.
- 3 December 2024. It is informed by the learned counsel for the appellant(s) that the defects as pointed out by the Registry, has been cured, list this matter before the Court.
- The record also contains 11 further orders. Each file is listed on the Orders tab.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Rishi Maheshwari, Mr Rishi Maheshwari, Mrs. Shally Bhasin Maheshwari, Mr. Raishi Maheshwari, Mrs. Shally Bhasin, Mr. Bharat Sood, Ms. Anne Mathew, Ms. Shruti Jose, Ms. Shally Bhasin, Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Mr. Rijuk, Mr. Rahul Raj Mishra Advocates — Respondents: Mr. K.N. Rai, Mr S.N.Rai, Mr. K. N. Rai, Mr. Kumar Rajeev, Mr. Vibhu Shankar Mishra, Mrs. Samta Pushkarna Mishra, Mr. Vimal J. Kerketta, Ms. Divya Kumari, Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Mr. Mani Shankar Mishra, Mr. Vibhu Shanker Mishra, Ms. Dibya Kumari
