SURENDER ARYA . & ORS. Versus FATEH SINGH . & ORS.. C.A. 14523/2015 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010405692015. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 13 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 4 January 2016 to 12 February 2026.
- On 9 May 2016 the order records: Four weeks time is given to the respondent Nos. 2 to 5 to file the counter affidavit. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 7 and 8 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
- On 26 October 2016 the order records: The respondent Nos. 6,9 & 10 have been served by dasti. The respondent No.1 has refused to receive the dasti notice. Thereafter, Ld.counsel for the petitioner has sent notice to the respondent No.1 on his email and by post and postal receipt has also been filed, but proof of delivery has not been filed. The email addre
- On 12 January 2017 the order records: The office report indicates that Respondent No.1 has refused to accept the service of dasti notice sent to him. This refusal on his part constitutes not proper service. Hence, f resh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the said respondent shall be taken by the learned counsel for the appellants within a pe
- On 24 January 2017 the order records: Four weeks time, as last chance, is given to the learned counsel for the petitioners to comply with the terms of the order dated 12.01.2017 of this Court in respect of respondent no. 1. IA for deletion of respondent no.2 from the array of parties shall be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for future direc
- On 30 August 2017 the order records: Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that respondent no.2 i.e. Election Commission of India, is not a necessary party. Accordingly, the name of respondent no.2 is deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the appellants.
- On 5 September 2017 the order records: By order dated 30.08.2017, this Court passed the following order in the instant appeal : “Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that respondent no.2 i.e. Election Commission of India, is not a necessary party.
- On 6 October 2017 the order records: Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.1 and 6-10, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. The respondent Nos.2 and 3-5 have been deleted from the array of parties by order dated 05.09.2017 and 9.12.2016 of the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber. Ld.counsel for the above respondent submits that his name s
- On 12 February 2026 the order records: The Civil Appeal is disposed of as infructuous in terms of the signed order. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of.
