SURAJ BHAN AND ORS. IV [P-2], [P-3.1], [P-3], [P-3.2] Versus ASHVARYA ESTATE PVT. LTD (JAGMAL SINGH) AND ORS. [R-3], ANKITA CHAUDHARY [ HEARD BY : HON. SANJAY KUMAR AND HON. K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JJ. ] INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT (C.A. 244/2011)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 244/2011

Case Record

C.A. 244/2011

SURAJ BHAN AND ORS. IV [P-2], [P-3.1], [P-3], [P-3.2] Versus ASHVARYA ESTATE PVT. LTD (JAGMAL SINGH) AND ORS. [R-3], ANKITA CHAUDHARY [ HEARD BY : HON. SANJAY KUMAR AND HON. K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JJ. ] INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

84 PDF renditions· 84 distinct judicial orders· 54 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

SURAJ BHAN & ORS. Versus ASHVARYA ESTATE PVT. LTD (JAGMAL SINGH) & ORS.. C.A. 244/2011 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010353682007. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 54 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 5 February 2013 to 3 August 2026.

On 5 February 2013 the order records: | | |Four weeks' time is granted to the counsel for both the parties to file | |Statement of Case. | | | |[KALYANI GUPTA] | |[PHOOLAN WATI ARORA] | |
On 10 December 2018 the order records: Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to delete respondent No.6 from the array of parties. Permission is granted. The name of respondent No.6 is allowed to be deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the appellant.
On 19 February 2020 the order records: Learned counsel for the appellants is not present. In C.A.No.244/2011, considering that the applications are filed to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased respondents as indicated therein and it is prima facie noticed that such of those respondents have been shown as proforma respondents and also a
On 3 February 2021 the order records: I. A. No. 77457/2020 stands dismissed as withdrawn as prayed. permission for their intervention in the pending proceedings.
On 20 September 2021 the order records: The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
On 18 March 2024 the order records: application for restoration is condoned. For the reasons stated in filing I.A. No.249215/2023 restoration application of I.A. No.84461/2023 is allowed. In the application, the reason given is that the name of the Advocate-on Record did not appeared in the cause list of 21.08.2023. A copy of this cause list is also anne
On 27 November 2025 the order records: Learned counsel appearing for the appellants seeks an adjournment on the ground that he was engaged recently. The matter has been pending on the file of this Court since the year 2007 and a stay was granted as long back as on 25.01.2008.
On 3 August 2026 the order records: The appeals are allowed in terms of the signed reportable judgment placed on the file. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

5 February 2013. | | |Four weeks' time is granted to the counsel for both the parties to file | |Statement of Case. | | | |[KALYANI GUPTA] | |[PHOOLAN WATI ARORA] | |
23 September 2013. List I.A. for early hearing on 30th September, 2013. |(Chetan Kumar) | |(Savita Sainani) | |
30 September 2013. Counsel is permitted to renew it in the year 2014. [Madhu Bala] [Savita Sainani] Sr.PA
3 January 2014. In spite of the order dated 21.2.2013 of the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers, in C.A. No. 244 of 2011, statement of case filed on behalf of respondent No. 12 has not been served on other side, in C.A. Nos. 539-541 of 2011 and C.A. No. 536 of 2011 parties have failed to file the statement of case. The Registry may list the ma
3 August 2016. As jointly prayed for, list these matters after one week. (Sanjay Kumar-II) (Sharda Kapoor)
26 October 2016. Learned counsel for the respondent mentioned that Mr.Arun Kumar Sinha, Advocate-on-Record, who appears for one of the respondents is not well and has not come to the Court today. On his request, the matter is adjourned for a week.
17 January 2017. List after four weeks.
2 March 2017. List after four weeks.
19 April 2017. As requested, list after ensuing summer vacation.
3 August 2017. At the request of Mr. Arun K. Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the respondent/s, list these matters on 09.08.2017. (SANJAY KUMAR-II) (INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL)
9 August 2017. List the matters after two weeks.
1 November 2017. At the request learned counsel for the appellant/s, list these matters on 15.11.2017. (SANJAY KUMAR-II) (INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL)
15 November 2017. As requested, list the matter after Christmas vacation.
8 August 2018. Respondent No.6 is reported to be dead. Learned counsel for the appellant shall within a period of four weeks' file an application for substitution to bring on record his Lrs. Mr. Arun Kumar Sinha, Ld. Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 7, 9 and 11 submits that Mr. Santosh Singh, Ld. Counsel for the appellant has expir
26 September 2018. As per previous order wherein it has been observed that Mrs. Santosh Singh, AOR for the appellant has expired and notice of …….2 ITEM NO.8 -2 alternative arrangement was directed to be issued to all the appellants. Such notice could not be served upon the appellants due to incomplete address. Today, Dr.K.R.Punia, Advoc
12 October 2018. Ld. Counsel for appellant Nos. 1, 2 and 4 have filed vakalatnama. Four weeks' time, as last chance, is given to learned counsel for appellants to comply with the terms of the order dated 8.8.2018 of this Court in respect of deceased respondent No.6.
10 December 2018. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to delete respondent No.6 from the array of parties. Permission is granted. The name of respondent No.6 is allowed to be deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the appellant.
4 February 2019. Two weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the appellants to file objections/reply to I.A. No. 3223/2019.
11 March 2019. Abatement is set aside. Delay in filing application for substitution is condoned.
2 April 2019. As per postal tracking report, notice issued to common sole respondent in alternative arrangement has been received back undelivered. Hence, learned counsel for appellant shall within a period of four weeks' file the fresh particulars of the said respondent and he shall also take requisite steps for the service of noti
16 August 2019. Learned counsel for appellant shall within a period of four ITEM NO.11 2 weeks', as a last chance file fresh particulars of common sole respondent and he shall also take requisite steps for the service of notice upon him. List again on 10.12.2019.
10 December 2019. Despite grant of last opportunity, Ld. counsel for the petitioner has not taken requisite steps and also failed to furnish ITEM NO.13 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IV fresh particulars for effecting service upon common sole Respondent, matters be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further order
24 January 2020. IN C.A. No. 540/2011 & in C.A. No. 536/2011 Respondent No.1 has not been served with the notice for making alternative arrangements. As per postal remarks, the address of respondent no.1 was found to be incomplete. Court Notice be issued to the counsel for the appellant.
19 February 2020. Learned counsel for the appellants is not present. In C.A.No.244/2011, considering that the applications are filed to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased respondents as indicated therein and it is prima facie noticed that such of those respondents have been shown as proforma respondents and also a
3 March 2020. Delay condoned. Abatement is set aside.
26 October 2020. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw I.A.No.77454/2020. Permission granted.
27 November 2020. The Counsel for the applicants in the impleadment application is not connected to the Video Conferencing. It is stated by one of the counsel for the respondent that the copies of the application have not been served. Therefore, adjourned by four weeks' to enable the counsel for the petitioner in the impleadment applica
3 February 2021. I. A. No. 77457/2020 stands dismissed as withdrawn as prayed. permission for their intervention in the pending proceedings.
20 September 2021. The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
17 November 2021. List next week.
The record also contains 24 further orders. Each file is listed on the Orders tab.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. K.D. Punia, Mr. Ramesh Punia, Ms. Santosh Singh, Mrs. Santosh Singh, Mr. K.R. Puniya, Dr. Ramesh Puniya, Mr. Rakesh Mudgal, Mr. Dinesh Mudgal, Ms. Sharda H.Adv., Dr. Monika Gusain, Ms. Naresh Bakshi, Ms. Ranjana Vohra Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Anubha Agarwal, Ms. Naresh Bakshi, Mr. M.A.Chinnasamy, Mr. S. Muthukrishnan, Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Mr. Priyaranjan Ambasthaa, Mr. R. Balasubramanium, Mr. Prabhal Kaushik, Mr. S. Muthu Krishnan, Mr. K. Krishna Kumar, Mr. M.A. Chinnasami, Ms. C. Rubavathi

Relief Sought & Granted

On 3 August 2026 the order records: The appeals are allowed in terms of the signed reportable judgment placed on the file.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 3 Aug 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 3 Aug 2026

Final disposition

The appeals are allowed in terms of the signed reportable judgment placed on the file.

Important procedural note

Written only from 54 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 24 other files in the folder were left out.