- 28 August 2015. Service upon all the five respondents is complete. All the respondents have been duly represented. All the parties have filed their statement of case.
- 3 February 2023. Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5 are duly represented. Vakalatnama filed by the learned counsel for the respondent No.3 is defective. Learned counsel shall within a period of four weeks cure the defects and within the same period file counter affidavit.
- 21 March 2023. Respondent Nos.1, 2, 4, 5 are duly represented. Four weeks time, is granted as a last chance to respondent No.3, to cure the defects in vakalatnama and also to file counter affidavit.
- 8 May 2023. Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5 are duly represented. As requested, four weeks time is granted to Respondent No.4 to file counter affidavit.
- 4 September 2023. Learned counsel who was appearing for the appellant is said to have been designated as senior counsel. There is no judicial order for issuance of Court notice to the appellants. Hence, if the then counsel appearing for the appellants or the appellants themselves do not make alternate arrangements within four weeks from
- 21 March 2024. There is no appearance on behalf of the appellants. 2. Counsel for respondents No.1 to 3 and 4 are present.
- 19 July 2024. Respondent Nos.1 to 5 are duly represented. Service of notice for alternative arrangement (Counsel designated as Sr. adv.) is not complete on both the appellants.
- 15 October 2024. 1. Learned counsel representing the appellants has been designated as Senior Advocate. 2. Consequently, notice was issued to the appellants for making alternative arrangement. It appears that service of notice on the appellants is not complete.
- 6 December 2024. No representation on behalf of the appellants. 2. Post this case after two weeks.
- 24 January 2025. No one has entered appearance on behalf of the appellant. The matter has been put up as the notice has been served upon the appellants. The counsel for the appellants has designated as senior advocate. The issue is to whom the responsibility to inform the party concerned.
- 21 April 2025. Issue notice to the appellants as the earlier counsel, who filed the present petition has been designated as Senior Advocate. Let notice be issued to the appellants for making alternative arrangement.
- 17 October 2025. 1. Service of notice on the appellant Nos. 1 and 2 is still awaited. 2. List the matter after appellants have been served.
- 8 December 2025. 1. The notice of service for alternative arrangement upon both the appellants returned with a remark “insufficient address”. 2. It is noticed that earlier also, nobody appeared on behalf of the appellants.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Jayant Kumar Mehta Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Amit Pawan, Mr. Dhirendra Singh Parmar, Mr. Mishra Saurabh, Mr. Bhaskar Roy, Mr. B. S. Banthia, Mr. Sukhamrit Singh, Mr. Praveen Swarup, Mr. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi, Mr. Sunny Choudhary, Mr. Ajay Sharma, Mr. Suresh Kumar Bhan, Mr. Ramesh Thakur
