- 13 October 2023. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes, at the outset, that in the event, any additional monetary relief is given to the petitioners by this Court, then the petitioners shall not claim any interest on the delayed period of 1429 days. 2. Issue notice on the application seeking condonation of delay as well as
- 22 May 2024. None appears for the respondent. List the matter after ensuing summer vacation.
- 5 December 2024. Learned counsel appearing for the insurance company (respondent No.1) prays for and is granted four weeks time to file response in the matter.
- 7 February 2025. 1. Learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1 submits that counter affidavit is already filed. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed before next listing. 2. List on 21.03.2025.
- 21 March 2025. 1. As per office report respondent No.2, namely, Shri Gundappa Balagouda Patil, owner of the vehicle stands served. However he has chosen not to enter appearance. 2. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the considered view that his presence is necessarily required for adjudication of the pres
- 28 April 2025. 1. In terms of the impugned judgment dated 22.07.2019, the liability is fastened upon respondent No.2, namely, Shri Gundappa Balagouda Patil. 2. Before we hear the matter on merit, we direct the said respondent to positively deposit the amount in terms of the impugned judgment, within a period of two weeks from today,
- 25 July 2025. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the amount stood deposited before the Registry of the High Court of Karnataka in terms of the order dated 28.04.2025. 2. Let the same be released in favour of the petitioners.
- 8 September 2025. List on 16.09.2025.
- 16 September 2025. 1 Mr. Piyush Hans,learned counsel submits that his client, who is the owner of the vehicle, preferred an appeal arising out of the very same judgment passed by the Tribunal which is pending consideration before the High Court. 2. In view of the same, we adjourn the matter. List on 3. Liberty granted to the parties to m
- 16 December 2025. 1. Delay condoned. 2. We have been informed that the another appeal/matter arising under the very same incident is pending consideration before the High Court.
- 17 February 2026. Respondent no.1 is duly represented. Counter affidavit has already been filed. Respondent no.2 is duly represented. Counter affidavit, if any, be filed in the meantime.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Manjunathmeled, Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Mrs. Vijayalaxmi Udapudi, Mr. Ganesh Kumar R., Mr. Sujeet Kumar, Ms. Arushi Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Herinder Kaur Brar, Mr. Zorawar Singh, Mr. Varun Tandon, Mr. Deepak Sharma, Mr. Jayant Rastogi, Ms. Dhreti Bhatia, Mr. Devesh Mishra, Mr. Piyush Hans, Mr. Raghav Nagpal, Mr. Jayant Rostogi, Ms. Nikita Singh, Mr. Paras Varshney
