- 6 May 2011. In the main case i.e. Civil Appeal No.10660 of 2010 titled "Center for Public Interest Litigation and others v. Union of India and others", this Court had, on 16.3.2011, issued the following direction: "While adjourning the case, we make it clear that no one including the newspapers shall interfere with the functioning
- 24 August 2011. Shri A.S. Chandhiok, learned Additional Solicitor General requests for an adjournment on the ground that he has to go to attend the Full Court Reference. Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the Central Bureau of Investigation, Shri Vikas Singh, learned senior counsel appearing for the non-petition
- 24 August 2011. Shri A.S. Chandhiok, learned Additional Solicitor General requests for an adjournment on the ground that he has to go to attend the Full Court Reference. Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the Central Bureau of Investigation, Shri Vikas Singh, learned senior counsel appearing for the non-petition
- 1 September 2011. Learned counsel assisting Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the Central Bureau of Investigation, handed over sealed envelopes containing the Progress Report submitted by the C.B.I. in Case No.RC DA1 2009 A 0045 and Preliminary Enquiry No.PE DA1 2011 A 0001 as also the Status Report of the invest
- 20 September 2011. List on 19.10.2011. To be taken up at 2.00 P.M.
- 29 November 2012. Perused office report dated 27.11.2012. Shri K.K.Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant Rajeshwar Singh says that his instructing counsel will comply with the office report within two days.
- 14 January 2013. On a mention made by Shri Vikas Singh, learned senior counsel, we direct that I.A.No.7 be listed on 11.02.2013 before a Bench comprising of Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.S.Singhvi and Hon'ble Mr.Justice K.S.Radhakrishnan. To be taken up after the normal work is over.
- 11 February 2013. Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner Rajeshwar Singh requests and we allow his client two weeks' time to file further affidavit in the context of the counter affidavits filed on behalf of the non petitioners. List the case on 12.03.2013.
- 12 March 2013. This is an application by Mohammed Arif, who claims to be the Managing Director of Channel One, for permission to intervene in the proceedings of Contempt Petition (C) No.224 of 2011 and to take on record the documents described as transcript of some compact disc. We have heard Shri Shailendra Singh, learned counsel fo
- 15 April 2013. Dr.Rajiv Dhawan, learned senior counsel appearing for respondent No.2 made further submissions and concluded his arguments. List the case on 17.04.2013. To be taken up at 2.00 P.M.
- 17 April 2013. Arguments in this case were partly heard on 15.04.2013. Shri Ram Jethmalani, learned senior counsel appearing for some of the respondent(s) requests for an adjournment by saying that he is busy in a part heard matter before another Bench. Shri K.K.Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and the o
- 1 May 2013. At the commencement of further hearing, Shri Ram Jethmalani, learned senior counsel appearing for respondent No.1 produced before the Court a xerox copy of letter dated 16.04.2013 relating to closure of the case registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation in the matter of Shri Upendra Rai. Shri Jethmalani says th
- 16 July 2013. Further arguments heard. For completion of arguments, the case is adjourned to To be taken up at 3.30 p.m.
- 17 July 2013. Arguments concluded. Orders reserved.
- 9 December 2013. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 1 May 2014. Shri K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the investigating agency submits that Shri Vivek Priyadarshi is the investigating officer for Central Bureau of Investigation and Dr. Rajeshwar Singh is the investigating officer for the Enforcemment Directorate, who are conducting the investigation of
- 4 May 2018. 46299 of 2018 (application for directions) and Contempt Petition (C) No. 224 of 2011 List these interlocutory applications and the contempt petition on 10.05.2018.
- 10 May 2018. List the matter for arguments on 10th July, 2018. The petitioner/applicant in the contempt petition can file additional affidavit, in the meantime.
- 20 September 2018. Three months time is extended. Interlocutory Application No. 130461/2018 is allowed.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Mr. H.P. Raval, Ms. Indira Jaising, Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Mr. Harish N. Parekh, Ms. Sonam Anand, Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Dr. Subramanian Swamy, Dr. Roxna Swamy Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Mr. Gaurav Kejriwal, Mr. Keshav Mohan, Mr. C.D. Singh, Shri Rajeshwar Singh, Shri Luthra, Shri K.K. Venugopal, Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Ms. Sonam Anand, Mr. Harish N. Parekh, Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Mr. Piyush Sangli
