- 17 December 2019. The learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant has confined the prayer to the imposition of a sum of Rs. 1 Crore against Environmental compensation and disciplinary action. Delay condoned.
- 2 March 2022. Four weeks time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner, to take fresh steps, to serve upon respondent nos. 1 to 7, as process could not be served upon them. List again on 12.04.2022.
- 12 April 2022. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to respondent Nos. 1 to 7 shall be taken by the learned counsel for appellant within a period of two weeks, as last chance. List again on 14.07.2022.
- 14 July 2022. Delay in filing spare copies is condoned. Registry to issue notice with utmost dispatch.
- 7 November 2022. Despite due service, none appears on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 4 and 7.
- 13 December 2022. Despite due service, none appears on behalf of respondent nos. Hence, process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
- 24 April 2023. Counsel for the applicant may serve copy of the application upon the state counsel. List the matter after two weeks.
- 15 May 2023. IA No. 181619/2022 No representation for the applicant. Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee, learned counsel, appearing for the appellant in the Civil Appeals, states that she is yet to receive a copy of the application.
- 1 September 2023. 1. Ms. Srija Choudhury, learned counsel, representing Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee, Advocate on Record for the appellant, states that they are yet to be served a copy of IA No. 181619/2022 filed by Respondent No.4.
- 6 October 2023. Ms. Urmila Kar Purkayastha, learned counsel representing Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the appellant, states that they are yet to receive a copy of I.A. No.181619 of 2022. However, Office Report dated 05.10.2023 indicates to the contrary. Mr. Amrish Kumar, learned counsel, appearing for respondent No
- 19 April 2024. IA No. 181619/2022 The instant I.A. has been moved on behalf of the respondent No.4 Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas seeking deletion from the array of parties. On going through the impugned judgment and the proceedings, it is apparent that the said respondent is in no manner necessary party in these proceedings.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee, Mr. Bikas Kar Gupta, Ms. Srija Choudhary, Ms. Srija Choudhury, Mr. Anant, Ms. Arushi Mishra, Mr. Sandeep, Ms. Urmila Kar Purkayastha, Mr. Annant, Ms. Osheen Bhat, Ms. Nitipriya Kar Advocates — Respondents: Ms. A. Deepa, Mr. Amrish Kumar, Mr. Leela Dha
