- 11 February 2011. The writ petition shall stand over for two weeks.
- 4 March 2011. Permission sought for withdrawal of the vakalatnama by Mr. Debasis Mishra, advocate, is granted. Tag this petition along with W.P. (C) No.310 of 1996 [Prakash Singh and Ors. vs. Union of India and Ors.].
- 11 April 2011. With regard to the implementation of Direction No.4 under the Heading Separation of Investiga tion , given in the case of Prakash Singh vs. Union of India [2006 (8) SCC 1], learned Solicit or General seeks time to take instructions on the question of functional segregation of the In vestigative Wing from the Law and Or
- 15 July 2014. Post on Tuesday, the 26th August, 2014. Learned counsel for the parties may in the meantime file detailed notes on the history of the litigation and the developments that have taken place so far as also the issues that need to be addressed and the possible solution thereof.
- 29 August 2014. Mr. Harish Salve, learned senior counsel has today given us a broad over view of the issues that fall for determination in these petitions. He has drawn our attention to the direction issued by this Court in Prakash Singh and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors. 2006 (8) SCC 1 and the purported compliance reported by the r
- 29 August 2014. Mr. Harish Salve, learned senior counsel has today given us a broad over view of the issues that fall for determination in these petitions. He has drawn our attention to the direction issued by this Court in Prakash Singh and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors. 2006 (8) SCC 1 and the purported compliance reported by the r
- 3 November 2014. When this matter came up for hearing before us on 29th August, 2014, we were told that two writ petitions challenging the Bihar Police Act, 2007 have been filed and are pending before the High Court at Patna. Keeping in view the fact that issues arising in those writ petitions are identical to those raised in W.P.(C) N
- 13 January 2015. Heard learned counsel for the parties. List the matter (s) on Thursday, the 15 th January, 2015 at 3.00 p.m.
- 15 January 2015. Mr. Harish N. Salve, learned amicus, proposes to file a compilation of certain further documents and materials. He may do so within a period of six weeks. Mr. Ranjit Kumar, learned Solicitor General, may respond to the same within a period of four weeks thereafter. Post on Wednesday, the 8th April, 2015.
- 14 July 2015. Mr. Harish N. Salve, learned Amicus, is not available. Post on Tuesday, the 25th August, 2015. A copy of Contempt Petition(C) No.177 of 2015 has been handed over to Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, learned counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh, to take instructions in the matter and to make his submissions before the next d
- 3 July 2018. Heard Mr.K.K.Venugopal, learned Attorney General for Union of India along with Mr.Maninder Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General, Mr.Prashant Bhushan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Gopal Sankaranarayanan, learned counsel for the intervenor. This is an application for modification of the judgment in Pr
- 30 July 2018. This is an application at the instance of the State of Meghalaya for modifying the order dated 3 rd July, 2018. We may immediately clarify that there is no need for modification at the instance of the State of Meghalaya because the situation is quite different. It is submitted by Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, learned counsel a
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Debasis Misra, Mr. Nitin Thakur, Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh, Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, Dr. Ashok Dhamija, Dr. Kailash Chand, Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Mr. Harish N. Salve, Mr. Ambhoj Kumar Sinha, Ms. Sonia Dhamija, Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Anis Suhrawardy, Mr. P. Parmeswaran, Mr. Aruneshwar Gupta, Mr. H.K. Puri, Ms. Priya Puri, Mr. Khwairakpam Nobin Singh, Mr. Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Mr. K.V. Viswanathan, Mr. V.N. Raghupathy, Ms. Kavita Wadia, Mr. Sanjay R. Hegde, Mr. Vikrant S. Bais
