- 11 September 2019. Delay in refiling the petition is condoned. (RAJNI MUKHI) (SUNIL KUMAR RAJVANSHI) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER
- 20 September 2019. Perused the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner. As prayed, list the matter after two weeks.
- 14 October 2019. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on being pointed out, seeks leave to add all the petitioners who were before the High Court as respondents. Leave granted.
- 26 November 2019. The Hon'ble Court on 14.10.2019 was pleased to pass the following order: “ Learned counsel for the petitioner, on being pointed out, seeks leave to add all the petitioners who were before the High Court as respondents.
- 12 February 2020. Respondent nos.1, 155 to 162, 171 to 178 & 190 are duly represented. Await certificate of service from the concerned High Court in respect of respondent nos. 2 to 154, 163 to 170, 179 to 189 & 191 to 231. Issue reminder.
- 28 February 2020. Perused Office Report dated 27.02.2020. IA 31831/2020 and IA 35886/2020 :
- 19 June 2020. Await service report from the High Court in respect of respondent nos.2 to 11, 14 -19, 26-27, 29-34, 40, 42, 48, 50 -64, 68-69, 71-72, 75, 79 -82, 85-89, 92-103, 105, 121 -126, 132-145, 148, 165 -170, 179, 180 -184, 186, 194 -203 and 214 -231.Issue reminder. However, ld. Counsel, Mr Bhuwan Shekhar appearing on behalf o
- 2 March 2021. IA No. 113150 of 2020: This application has been filed by the State of U.P. in pursuance of order dated 14.10.2019 of this Court. As prayed, the application for impleadment, is allowed.
- 19 January 2023. IA No.131589/2021 Heard learned counsel Mr. Sanjay Singh appearing for the applicant/respondent no.182 in C.A. No.8040 of 2019. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that a typographical mistake has occurred in the name of respondent no.182 and prayed that the same may be permitted to be corrected as “Rakesh Kuma
- 6 February 2023. Notice issued to respondent no. 216 is returned with remark “refusal” by post. Hence, there is deemed service in respect of respondent no. 216, but no one has entered appearance for the said respondent. As per service report, notices issued to respondent nos. 33 and 225 are duly pasted on the addresses shown for these
- 22 March 2023. Two weeks time, is granted as a last chance to the appellants, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of respondent Nos.3, 10, 11, 92 and 133, who are unserved and file application for substitution in respect of deceased respondent nos.48, 135 and 228. Service is complete on other respondents.
- 9 May 2023. Two weeks time, is granted to appellants, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars to issue notice respondent 92 and to take fresh steps in respect of respondent Nos. 3, 10, 11 and 133 , who are unserved. Four weeks time is granted to cure the defects in application for substitution filed in respect of Respondent
- 28 July 2023. Respondent nos.219, 220 and 221 have already filed counter affidavit. Appearing respondents are granted four weeks time to file counter affidavit, if not filed.
- 6 October 2023. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants seeks and is granted four weeks' time to cure the defects as pointed out by the Office. 2. List after five weeks with an appropriate office report.
- 20 November 2023. 1. As prayed, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) is granted four weeks' time to submit death certificate of respondent No. 48 and to file spare copies in respect of unserved respondent Nos.3, 10 and 133, to furnish fresh particulars and to take steps for effecting service upon respondent Nos. 79, 81, 92 and 121. 2.
- 19 January 2024. IA No. 96318/2023, IA No. 176999/2023, IA No. 96319/2023, IA No. 96320/2023 AND IA No. 177005/2023 As per the office report, the said applications are defective.
- 15 April 2024. At request of Ms. Sansriti Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner, three weeks' time is granted to cure the defects pointed out by the Registry. The application prays for substitution of Lrs. of deceased respondent No.11 as respondent Nos. 11(a)Ms. Indu Srivastava, 11(b)Mr. Avanish Kumar Srivastava and 11(c)Ms. Swa
- 21 August 2024. Despite three weeks' time being granted for curing the defects, the same has still not been done. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants seeks further indulgence.
- 13 September 2024. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is granted a week's time for filing a chart indicating the steps taken so far. List after two weeks.
- 30 September 2024. 1. Heard Ms. Sansriti Pathak, learned counsel for the appellant State of Uttar Pradesh and others. 2. In so far as respondent Nos.79,81 and 92 are concerned, she submits that these respondents have been served through dasti.
- 13 November 2024. Learned counsel submits that the service on respondent No.3 is complete and proof of service is also filed in the Registry of this Court on 11 th November, 2024. Learned counsel further submits that in so far as respondent No.121 is concerned, there is an error in the office report. The office report reads as under:
- 28 March 2025. 1. The interlocutory application being IA No. 206458 of 2024 was filed seeking deletion of Respondent No.135-Sanjeev Kumar Singh (deceased), from the array of parties in Civil Appeal No. 8040/2019. The same was allowed by order dated 30.09.2024, which reads as under :
- 21 July 2025. Two weeks time, is granted to Ld. counsel for the petitioner, to take fresh steps and to file fresh particulars, for service on respondent nos.48.1 to 48.5, 228.1 and 228.2. As per affidavit of dasti service, notice has been received by brother of Respondent no.81. Four weeks time, is granted to Ld. counsel for the app
- 28 August 2025. Respondent No. 135 has been deleted vide Hon'ble Judge -in Chamber's order dated 30.09.2024 Two weeks time, as last chance is granted to Ld. Counsel for the appellant, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars, to issue notice to respondent Nos. 48(i) to 48(v), 228.1 and 228.2. Four weeks time, as last opportunity
- 27 October 2025. Respondent No. 135 has been deleted vide Hon'ble Judge-in Chambers order dated 30.09.2024. As per Office report dated 21.03.2025, it was mentioned that Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed Affidavit alongwith proof of service on brother of Respondent No. 81 and respondent No. 81 seems to be expired. Despite two oppo
- 23 July 2026. 1. Office report indicates that the order dated 27.10.2025 has not been complied with by the learned counsel for the Appellants. 2. However, as a last opportunity, two weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the Appellants to file fresh particulars for effecting service on respondent Nos.48.1 to 48.5, 228.1 a
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Krishnanand Pandeya, Ms. Sansriti Pathak, Mr Anil Kr Verma, Ms Vasundhara Singh, Ms. Pooja Singh, Ms. Sansriti Patak, Mr. Yash Kirti Kumar Bharti, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Mr. Mridul Jain, Mr. Sandeep Singh, Mr. Pawan, Mr. Parvesh Tyagi Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Anjani Kumar Mishra, Mr Rohini Prasad Tiwari, Ms Hardeep Kaur, Mr Shiv Ram Pandey, Mr C.M.Patel, Dr Arun Kumar Jha, Ms Hardeep Kaur Mishra, Mr Sunil Tripathi, Mr Rajendra Beniwal, Mr Kumar Sumit, Mr Chirag Gupta, Ms Bano Deswal
