- 7 April 2003. ..........L.......I.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.....J. .SP2 Tag with Civil Appeal No.897/2002.
- 4 October 2004. Let the synopsis pointed out in the office report be supplied positively within two weeks.
- 24 January 2005. Delay in filing the written submissions is condoned. Submissions are taken on record.
- 3 March 2005. The question involved in this appeal is whether the National Remote Sensing Agency is an indus try under the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act or not. The similar questions pertain ing to the various departments have been referred to a Constitution Bench, therefore, we think it appropriate that this appeal also
- 7 April 2005. Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel started his arguments at 10.40 a.m. and concluded at 2.05 p.m. Thereafter, Mrs. Shobha Dikshit, learned senior counsel argued the ma tter for about 10 minutes. Then, Mr. S.K. Dholkiya, learned senior counsel started his argumen ts and concluded at 2.15 p.m. Thereafter, Mr. T.R
- 13 April 2005. Ms. Indira Jaisingh, learned senior counsel resumed her arguments at 10.30 a.m. and conclude d at 11.25 a.m. Thereafter, Mr. Colin Gonsalvase, learned senior counsel started his arguments and concluded at 2.55 p.m. Then, Mr. A.K. Srivastava, learned senior counsel started his argu ments and concluded at 3.10 p.m. There
- 2 May 2006. List I.A.No.2 along with the main matter.
- 24 September 2007. Delay condoned. Issue notice.
- 28 January 2008. Delay condoned. Issue notice.
- 25 July 2008. Issue notice. Tag with C.A. No.897/2002.
- 23 February 2009. The question involved in this case is in relation to the ambit of section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 which has been referred by a Constitution Bench in the case of State of U.P. Vs. Jai Bir Singh (2005) 5 SCC 1 (Civil Appeal No. 897/2002)to a larger Bench for reconsideration of the decision of Bangalore
- 10 July 2009. Put up along with C.A.No. 897/2002. [SUMAN WADHWA] [SHASHI BALA VIJ]
- 20 July 2009. No one has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent despite service of notice. Tag this matte with Civil Appeal No. 897/2002 titled "Jaibir Singh Vs. State of U.P." and batch.
- 16 September 2009. Tag this matter with Civil Appeal No. 897/2002 titled "State of U.P. Vs. Jai Bir Singh" and the batch.
- 26 April 2010. Delay condoned. Leave granted. Meanwhile, there will be stay of the operation of the impugned order.
- 4 April 2011. Delay condoned. Leave granted.
- 4 April 2011. Delay condoned. Leave granted.
- 2 September 2011. Delay condoned. Leave granted.
- 27 January 2012. Leave granted. The appeal will be heard on the SLP paper book.
- 23 July 2012. Delay condoned. Leave granted.
- 3 May 2013. Delay condoned. Heard Mr. Balasubramaniam, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner in S.L.P.(C).......CC Nos.8448-8449/2013, Mr.
- 29 January 2016. Tag with Civil Appeal No.897 of 2002.
- 17 November 2016. Delay condoned. Arguments heard.
- 2 January 2017. T.S. THAKUR, CJI. 1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties at considerable length. We have also been taken through relevant passages of the decision of this Court in Bangalore Water Supply & Sewarage Board etc. v. A.
- 21 June 2018. List these appeals along with Civil Appeal No.897 of 2002 and connected matters.
- 21 September 2022. 1 Ms K Sarda Devi, counsel for the respondent is discharged from the proceedings in view of the appearance of counsel, Ms Nidhi. 2 The Interlocutory Application (IA No 119866/2022 in CA No 4569/2002) is disposed of in terms of the signed order.
- 30 November 2022. Issue notice on the application for substitution and application for condonation of delay in filing of the application for substitution returnable within four weeks. Office report records that the counsel for the respondent has not filed an application for setting aside abatement. There is no such requirement for couns
- 13 January 2023. List on 16.01.2023.
- 16 January 2023. Delay condoned in filing substitution application. Application for substitution to bring on record Lrs. of sole respondent is allowed.
- 12 October 2023. 1 On the request of Mr Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General, the Union of India is impleaded as a party. 2 Issue notice to the newly impleaded party.
- The record also contains 7 further orders. Each file is listed on the Orders tab.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. S.B. Upadhyay, Mr. Sunil Gupta, Mr. Pramod Dayal, Mr. Vivek Vishnoi, Ms. Shobha Dixit, Mr. Javed, Mr. Kamlendra Mishra, Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Ms. Rashmi Singh, Mr. Bharat Sangal, Mr. J.M. Rao, Mr. R.C. Verma Advocates — Respondents: Mr. V.K.Rao, Ms. Madhu Sikri, Mr. M.K. Garg, Mr. Yash Pal Dhingra, Mr. Manish Shankar, Ms. Shobha Dixit, Mr. Javed, Mr. Kamlendra Mishra, Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Ms. Rashmi Singh, Mr. Prag Tripathi, Mr. V.K. Rao
