THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE FILING (Diary No. 345/2026)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · Diary No. 345/2026

Case Record

Diary No. 345/2026

THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE FILING

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH

Diary No.Quashing order Criminal appeals Delay Investigation

7 PDF renditions· 7 distinct judicial orders· 4 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

MUNIVEL & ORS. Versus THE STATE, REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE. Diary No. 345/2026 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010331522024. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 4 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 28 August 2024 to 19 January 2026.

On 28 August 2024 the order records: IA No.181648/2024 in SLP (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 33154/2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently submits that learned High Court while appreciating and addressing the evidence was pleased to observe that the ocular witnesses namely, the PW-1 and PW-2 who themselves are injured witnesses failed to specify the n
On 3 December 2024 the order records: Perused the office report dated 30.11.2024. List these matters again after one week as learned counsel for the respondent-State of Tamil Nadu is not present.
On 3 January 2025 the order records: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. The petitioners were convicted by the trial Court for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 307 read with 34, 326 of the IPC.
On 19 January 2026 the order records: 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

28 August 2024. IA No.181648/2024 in SLP (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 33154/2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently submits that learned High Court while appreciating and addressing the evidence was pleased to observe that the ocular witnesses namely, the PW-1 and PW-2 who themselves are injured witnesses failed to specify the n
3 December 2024. Perused the office report dated 30.11.2024. List these matters again after one week as learned counsel for the respondent-State of Tamil Nadu is not present.
3 January 2025. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. The petitioners were convicted by the trial Court for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 307 read with 34, 326 of the IPC.
19 January 2026. 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. B. Karunakaran Advocates — Respondents: Mr. D. Kumanan, Mr. Sheikh F. Kalia, Mr. Chinmay Anand Panigrahi, Dr. Joseph Aristotle, Mr. Sabarish Subramanian

Relief Sought & Granted

On 19 January 2026 the order records: The appeals are disposed of in terms of signed order.

Subjects

Quashing order Criminal appeals Delay Investigation

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 19 Jan 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 19 Jan 2026

Final disposition

The appeals are disposed of in terms of signed order.

Important procedural note

Written only from 4 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 3 other files in the folder were left out.