- 8 May 2012. Time for making of the deposit in terms of order dated 19.03.2012 is extended by two weeks from today. IA No. 2 of 2012 is disposed of accordingly.
- 24 April 2015. File not received. List again on 5.5.2015.
- 17 April 2017. F.D.R. be renewed for a further period of one year from the date of its maturity.
- 24 April 2018. F.D.R. be renewed for a further period of one year from the due date of its maturity.
- 11 April 2022. F.D.R. be renewed for a further period of one year from the due date of its maturity i.e. 17.5.2022.
- 18 April 2023. FDR be renewed for a further period of one year from the due date of its maturity i.e., 17.5.2023.
- 15 September 2023. IA No. 77071/2023 1. By way of this application, the respondent seeks amendment of the cause title in view of the fact that it is no longer a partnership firm as it has now attained the status of a private limited company. 2. The application is accordingly allowed and the amended Memo of Parties, at Annexure A3, is tak
- 22 April 2024. FDR be renewed for a further period of 1 year from the due date of its maturity i.e. 17.5.2024.
- 3 April 2025. 1. The application ( I.A. No.75675 of 2025 ) seeking permission for taking the reply filed by the respondent on record is allowed. 2. Let learned counsel appearing for the appellants file rejoinder to the said application, if they wish to. Needful be done in two weeks.
- 2 May 2025. F.D.R be renewed for a further period of ONE YEAR from the due date of its maturity i.e. 17.5.2025.
- 8 September 2025. The application for early hearing is allowed. List on 10.12.2025.
- 18 March 2026. List the appeal on 16.04.2026.
- 12 May 2026. FDR is renewed for a further period of one year. Copy of this Record of Proceedings be furnished to the concerned Learned Advocate-on-Record for information and compliance.
- 6 August 2026. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants seeks one more adjournment. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent raises objection for an adjournment on the premise that even on the previous occasion such requests have been made.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Madhavi Divan, Mr. Sanjay, Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, Mr. Sachin Patil, Mr. Rahul Chitnis, Mr. Aaditya A. Pande, Mr. Geo Joseph, Ms. Shwetal Shepal, Mr. C. Aravind, Mr. Yuvraj Gaikwad Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Manish Pitale, Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri, Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Mr. Vipul Kumar, Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Mr. Navin Pahwa, Mr. Akshit Pradhan, Mr. Yogesh Verma, Mr. Yuvraj Kashyap, Mr. Divyansh Agrawal
