- 3 May 2012. Taken on board. There shall be interim stay of all further proceedings in Contempt Petition No. 38 of 2012 in Writ Petition No. 4661 of 2007 dated 08.03.2011.
- 3 September 2012. Delay condoned. Issue notice.
- 3 February 2023. Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4 but none has entered appearance on their behalf. Two weeks time is given to the learned counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps and for furnishing the fresh particulars of respondent No.2. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served.
- 21 March 2023. Despite due service on respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4, there is no appearance. Two weeks time, is granted as a last chance to the petitioner, for furnishing fresh particulars and to take fresh steps in respect of respondent No.2, who is unserved.
- 8 May 2023. No one has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1, 3 & 4, despite due service of notice. Despite last chance, having been granted, learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars, to effect service upon Respondent No. 2.
- 4 March 2024. Learned counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks' time to comply with the Office report. (GEETA JOSHI) (VEENA RANI NAGPAL) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER
- 30 October 2025. The Dasti service is permitted to serve respondent No.2.
- 16 February 2026. Despite service being complete, none has entered appearance for respondent nos. 1 and 4. Counter affidavit on behalf of respondent no.3, if any, be filed by 09.03.2026.
- 17 March 2026. Service is complete on respondent nos. 1 and 4 but none has entered appearance. Opportunity to file counter affidavit on behalf of respondent no. 3 has already been declined.
- 16 April 2026. Service is complete on respondent nos. 1 and 4 but none has entered appearance. Opportunity to file counter affidavit on behalf of respondent no. 3 has already been declined.
- 12 August 2026. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) is granted two weeks' time to file affidavit of dasti service in respect of respondent No. 2. 2. List accordingly.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Aparajita Singh, Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Mr. Pravin Satale, Mr. Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Mr. Rishabh Jain, Mr. S.k. Sarkar, Ms. Shwetal Shepal, Ms. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, Mr. Bharat Bagla, Ms. Kirti Dadheech, Mr. Sk Sarkar Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande
