THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS. Versus MOHAN MEAKIN LIMITED AND ORS. (C.A. 4696/2024)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 4696/2024

Case Record

C.A. 4696/2024

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS. Versus MOHAN MEAKIN LIMITED AND ORS.

REGISTRAR

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

12 PDF renditions· 12 distinct judicial orders· 12 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ORS. Versus MOHAN MEAKIN LIMITED & ORS.. C.A. 4696/2024 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010372782018. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 12 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 18 February 2019 to 9 March 2026.

On 18 February 2019 the order records: Delay condoned. Issue notice.
On 5 April 2019 the order records: Respondent no.1 is granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent no.2 within two weeks time.
On 16 July 2019 the order records: None appeared for the petitioner when called. Sole respondent has filed counter affidavit.
On 22 October 2019 the order records: Respondent No.1 has filed counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps alongwith fresh particulars of respondent No.2 within two weeks.
On 20 January 2020 the order records: Complete matters. Respondent No.1 has filed counter affidavit.
On 23 August 2022 the order records: Respondent no.1 has filed counter affidavit. Ld. counsel, Ms Kanishka Mittal appearing on behalf of Mr Nishit Agrawal, Advocate-on-record for respondent no.2 submits that they wish to adopt the counter affidavit filed by respondent no.1. Submissions are taken on record.
On 27 September 2022 the order records: Respondent no.1 has filed counter affidavit. Respondent no.2 has adopted the counter affidavit filed by respondent no.1.
On 9 March 2026 the order records: Respondent Nos.1 & 3 are duly represented. Counter affidavit has already been filed by respondent No.2.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

18 February 2019. Delay condoned. Issue notice.
22 February 2019. Delay condoned. Issue notice.
5 April 2019. Respondent no.1 is granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent no.2 within two weeks time.
16 July 2019. None appeared for the petitioner when called. Sole respondent has filed counter affidavit.
22 October 2019. Respondent No.1 has filed counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps alongwith fresh particulars of respondent No.2 within two weeks.
20 January 2020. Complete matters. Respondent No.1 has filed counter affidavit.
23 August 2022. Respondent no.1 has filed counter affidavit. Ld. counsel, Ms Kanishka Mittal appearing on behalf of Mr Nishit Agrawal, Advocate-on-record for respondent no.2 submits that they wish to adopt the counter affidavit filed by respondent no.1. Submissions are taken on record.
27 September 2022. Respondent no.1 has filed counter affidavit. Respondent no.2 has adopted the counter affidavit filed by respondent no.1.
7 February 2024. List on 09.02.2024.
9 February 2024. List on 02.04.2024 for final disposal.
2 April 2024. Leave granted. The issue involved in this matter is substantially connected to the issue raised in the case of State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
9 March 2026. Respondent Nos.1 & 3 are duly represented. Counter affidavit has already been filed by respondent No.2.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, Ms. Malvika Yadav, Mr. Ashok Basoya, Mr. Sandeep Kumar Jha, Mr. Vivek Thanka, Mr. Pallav Srivastava, Mr. Arman Sharma, Dr. Vinod Kr.Tewari, Mr. Anup Kumar Rattan, Mr. Puneet Rajta, Mr. Vaibhav Shrivastava, Ms. Vineeta Tiwari Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Nishit Agrawal, Mr Nishit Agrawal, Mr. Harsh Mishra, Ms. Prema Singh, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Mr. K. Subba Rao, Ms. Gauri Neo Rampal, Ms Kanishka Mittal, Mr Nirmit Bhalla, Mr Ashok Kumar, Mr Raj Bahadur Yadav, Mr Raj

Relief Sought & Granted

On 9 March 2026 the latest order on this record says: Respondent Nos.1 & 3 are duly represented. Counter affidavit has already been filed by respondent No.2.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals Delay

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 9 Mar 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 9 Mar 2026

Next hearing

9 Mar 2026

Important procedural note

Written only from 12 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.