- 18 September 2020. The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking an adjournment on the ground of personal difficulty, let the matter be listed after four weeks.
- 16 November 2020. The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. List this matter before a Bench of which one of us (Surya Kant, J.) is not a member.
- 18 January 2021. Issue notice. Tag with Writ Petition (Criminal)No.293 of 2019.
- 3 October 2023. In view of letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner seeking adjournment on the ground of personal difficulty, the matters are adjourned by two weeks.
- 14 May 2024. Issue rule. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that normalcy is prevailing for quite some time. Mr.
- 16 October 2024. On the last occasion when the matter was taken up for hearing on 14.05.2024, the following order was passed: “Issue rule.
- 25 March 2025. We have pursed the letter dated 31 st January, 2025 written by Shri Kamendra Prasad DG Police (Retd.). The aforesaid communication depicts a very sorry state of affairs. Despite efforts being undertaken, the State is not willing to cooperate.
- 20 May 2025. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent states that the SIT has already made a visit in the second week of May, 2025 and therefore, it might take some more time to file the report. List the matter on 19.08.2025.(NMD) We request the SIT to file the report on or before the end of July, 2025.
- 19 August 2025. The Registry is directed to prepare the translation of the report filed within a period of four weeks. Thereafter, copies shall be given to the learned counsel for the parties. The respondent-State shall pay the honorarium to those who are helping the SIT Members, at the rate of Rs.5,000/- per day, for the period of 45
- 7 October 2025. The Registry is directed to supply a soft copy of the report of the SIT to the learned counsel for parties within a period of three weeks. In the meantime, the members of the SIT are at liberty to make a representation to the Chief Secretary of the State within a period of two weeks from the receipt of this order for t
- 20 January 2026. At request of the learned counsel appearing for the State of Haryana - respondent No.1, list these matters on 24.02.2026. In the meanwhile, a direction is issued to the effect that the State of Haryana shall pay a further sum of Rs.5 Lakhs of to each of the members of the SIT, as a final settlement.
- 24 February 2026. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1 submits that the honorarium has been paid by the State to the members of of the SIT. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks an adjournment as the senior counsel is not available today.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Nikhil Jain, Mr. Satya Prakash, Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Ms. Kawalpreet Kaur, Mr. Satya Mitra, Mr. Narendra Hooda, Mr. Susheel Tomar, Mr. Nayab Gouhar, Mr. Manik Gupta, Mr. Shiv Bhatnagar, Mr. Yuvraj Nandal, Ms. Kavya Manuja Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Vishwa Pal Singh, Dr. Monika Gusain, Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Vatsal Joshi, Mr. Madhav Sinhal, Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Mr. Susheel Tomar, Mr. Sanjeev Malhotra, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, Mr. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Mr. Rajan Kr. Chourasia
