STATE BANK OF INDIA Versus ADHUNIK STEELS LIMITED THROUGH MANAGER (C.A. 2174/2020)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 2174/2020

Case Record

C.A. 2174/2020

STATE BANK OF INDIA Versus ADHUNIK STEELS LIMITED THROUGH MANAGER

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI

C.A.Appellate relief Civil appeals

14 PDF renditions· 14 distinct judicial orders· 14 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

STATE BANK OF INDIA Versus ADHUNIK STEELS LIMITED THROUGH MANAGER. C.A. 2174/2020 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010091032020. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 14 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 20 May 2020 to 23 September 2025.

On 20 May 2020 the order records: Issue notice. Waive service on the sole respondent since Mr. Pijush Kanti Roy, learned counsel is appearing on its behalf.
On 18 June 2020 the order records: In view of the letter circulated by Advocate-on-Record for the respondent seeking adjournment for filing counter affidavit, put up after four weeks.
On 28 March 2022 the order records: In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the respondent, the matter is adjourned to 20.07.2022. (ARUSHI SUNEJA) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
On 1 September 2022 the order records: List the matter after three weeks to enable learned counsel for the appellant to file Rejoinder Affidavit. In the meantime, written submissions also be filed.
On 23 April 2025 the order records: 1. List this appeal on 07th May, 2025. 2. In the meantime, parties shall file their written submissions.
On 29 July 2025 the order records: 1. Learned counsel for the respondent seeks adjournment. 2. List in the week commencing 11th August, 2025.
On 12 August 2025 the order records: 1. In view of the letter circulated seeking adjournment, matter stands adjourned. 2.List after two weeks.
On 23 September 2025 the order records: 1. The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order, which is placed on the file. 2. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

20 May 2020. Issue notice. Waive service on the sole respondent since Mr. Pijush Kanti Roy, learned counsel is appearing on its behalf.
18 June 2020. In view of the letter circulated by Advocate-on-Record for the respondent seeking adjournment for filing counter affidavit, put up after four weeks.
28 March 2022. In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the respondent, the matter is adjourned to 20.07.2022. (ARUSHI SUNEJA) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
1 September 2022. List the matter after three weeks to enable learned counsel for the appellant to file Rejoinder Affidavit. In the meantime, written submissions also be filed.
14 February 2023. List next week at the request of the learned counsel for the respondent.
24 February 2023. List the matter on a non-miscellaneous day after four weeks.
16 April 2025. As prayed, list the civil appeal next week.
23 April 2025. 1. List this appeal on 07th May, 2025. 2. In the meantime, parties shall file their written submissions.
14 May 2025. List on 29.07.2025.
29 July 2025. 1. Learned counsel for the respondent seeks adjournment. 2. List in the week commencing 11th August, 2025.
12 August 2025. 1. In view of the letter circulated seeking adjournment, matter stands adjourned. 2.List after two weeks.
2 September 2025. List on 16.09.2025.
16 September 2025. 1. List next week.
23 September 2025. 1. The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order, which is placed on the file. 2. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Misha, Ms. Mahima Sareen, Mr. Nikhil Mathur, Mr. S. S. Shroff, Mr. Lalit Kumar, Mr. Daksh Kadian, Ms. Sanyukta Fauzdar Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Pijush Kanti Roy, Mr. Anup Kumar, Mr. Rajan K. Chourasia, Ms. Neha Jaiswal, Mr. Shivam Kumar, Ms. Shruti Singh, Ms. Pragya Choudhary, Mr. Awanish Gupta, Mrs. Neha Jaiswal, Mrs. Shruti Singh, Mr. Abhisek Kumar, Ms. Vartika Vaishnavi

Relief Sought & Granted

On 23 September 2025 the order records: The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order, which is placed on the file.

Subjects

Appellate relief Civil appeals

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 23 Sept 2025

Latest development

Latest recorded event 23 Sept 2025

Final disposition

The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order, which is placed on the file.

Important procedural note

Written only from 14 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.