- 14 October 2024. 1. Issue notice, returnable within four weeks. 2. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
- 27 January 2025. 1. We grant two weeks' time, by way of a last chance, to the respondent to take instructions. 2. List these matters on 10.02.2025.
- 10 February 2025. 1. The respondent-wife is personally present in the Court. 2. The Family Court (Additional District Judge, Chandigarh) had granted visitation rights to the father to meet the minor child on last Sunday of every month between 10 a.m. to 01:00 p.m. for a period of six months from the date of the order and it had also dir
- 21 July 2025. 1. Taking into consideration that the dispute is a matrimonial dispute, we consider it appropriate to refer the parties to mediation. CONMT.PET.(C) NOS. 756-757/2024 2. With the consent of parties, we appoint Hon'ble Ms.
- 17 November 2025. IA No. 279640/2025: List in the month of December, 2025.
- 1 December 2025. 1. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, we are of the considered view that interest of the child being paramount consideration and without expressing any opinion with regard to the mediation report submitted by Justice Ritu Bahri, former Chief Justice of the Uttarakhand High Court and making it c
- 19 February 2026. 1. After having heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the voluminous records and orders passed by the courts below as well as by this Court, we notice that in the agony of the fight between the father and mother, the child seems to be sandwiched and this Court can visualise the tr
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Ms. Sneha Irine Kachhap, Mr. Amith, Mr. T. R. B. Sivakumar, Mr. Patwalia, Mrs. T.s. Shanthi, Ms. Sneha Irvine Kachhap, Mr. Amit, Mrs. T.s.shanthi, Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Mrs. T.S. Shanthi, Mr. P.S Patwaliya Advocates — Respondents: Ms. Anubha Agrawal
