- 12 February 2013. By way of last opportunity, eight weeks' time is granted to the counsel for the appellant to file the statement of case. Respondent may file the statement of case within six weeks thereafter.
- 29 April 2013. Respondent will file statement of case within two weeks from today failing which the respondent will not be heard. | (G. SUDHAKARA RAO) | | (USHA SHARMA) | |
- 18 September 2013. Appellant has filed the statement of case. Respondent has not filed the statement of case in spite of the time granted by the Hon'ble Court dated 29.4.13. Hence, list the matter before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
- 2 February 2023. Service of notice of alternative arrangement(counsel expired) is not complete on the sole appellant as such, Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for necessary directions.
- 4 August 2023. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that they would be filing power on behalf of the sole appellant for which he seeks two weeks' time. Accordingly, the same is granted. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent is present.
- 22 September 2023. Ms. Shweta Kapoor, learned counsel, states that she was not in a position to secure a vakalatnama from the sole appellant after the demise of Mr. Anis Ahmed Khan, learned counsel on record, who expired on 04.12.2020. In the event the appellant does not choose to engage another learned counsel within four weeks from tod
- 13 May 2025. Respondent No. 1 is duly represented. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed an application for substitution in respect of deceased respondent No.2, which is defective. As sought, two weeks time is granted to cure the defects.
- 6 August 2025. Respondent no. 1 is duly represented. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed an application seeking substitution of the legal representatives of the deceased respondent no.2. Same is allowed, being in time. Let cause title be amended accordingly.
- 16 September 2025. Respondent No.1 is duly represented. Certificate of service of notice of lodgement of petition of appeal is still awaited from the concerned High Court with regard to respondent Nos. 2.1 to 2.7, 3, 4.1 to 4.3. Let a reminder be issued.
- 6 November 2025. Respondent No.1 is duly represented. Service is complete on respondent Nos. 2.2, 2.6 and 4.1 by way of certificate of service received from the concerned High Court still none has entered appearance.
- 9 December 2025. Respondent no. 1 is duly represented. Certificate of service from concerned High Court with regard to respondent nos. 2.1 to 2.4, 3, 4.2 and 4.3 is still awaited.
- 20 January 2026. Respondent no.1 is duly represented. Service was complete on respondent nos. 2.1 to 2.3, 2.6, 4.1 and 4.2 through High Court on 11.09.2025 and 10.12.2025 respectively but none has entered appearance.
- 17 February 2026. Respondent no.1 is duly represented. Service was complete on respondent nos. 2.2, 2.6, 4.1 on 11.09.2025 and on respondent nos. 2.1, 2.3, 4.2 on 10.12.2025 through High Court but none has entered appearance.
- 23 March 2026. Respondent no.1 is duly represented. Service was complete on respondent nos. 2.2, 2.6, 4.1 on 11.09.2025 and on respondent nos. 2.1, 2.3, 4.2 on 10.12.2025 through concerned High Court but none has entered appearance.
- 16 July 2026. 1. The civil appeal stands allowed in terms of the signed order which is placed on the file. 2. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Shiwani Mahipal, Mr. Anis Ahmed Khan, Mr. R.K. Kapoor, Ms. Shweta Kapoor, Mr. Parikshit Mahipal, Mr. Kheyali Singh, Mr. Rajat Kapoor, Ms. Kheyali Singh, Ms. Aakriti Kapila, Mr. Zahid Hussain, Mr. Ganesh Kumar Malviya, Ms. Sujata Sarkar Advocates — Respondents: Mr. M.C. Dhingra, Mr. Vishal Malik, Mr. Sanjay Malik, Mr. Baljit Rathi, Mr Ananta Prasad Mishra, Mr. Gagan Gupta, Mr. Deepak Jain, Mr. Ananta Prasad Mishra, Mr. Saurabh Gupta, Mr. Jasbir Singh, Mrs. Susmita Mahala
