SMALL SCALE ENTERPRENEURS ASSOCIATION AND III ORS. Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. (C.A. 7318/2010)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · C.A. 7318/2010

Case Record

C.A. 7318/2010

SMALL SCALE ENTERPRENEURS ASSOCIATION AND III ORS. Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI

C.A.Direction to public body Civil appeals Municipal law

50 PDF renditions· 50 distinct judicial orders· 39 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

SMALL SCALE ENTERPRENEURS ASSOCIATION & ORS. Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.. C.A. 7318/2010 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010251182010. Status on the court record: DISPOSED. This page is written from 39 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 4 November 2011 to 27 May 2026.

On 4 November 2011 the order records: List the applications on 21st November, 2011, when the applications for interim relief are coming up for consideration.
On 21 November 2011 the order records: We have heard learned Senior Counsel appearing for the parties. In our view, no case for grant of interim relief is made out. The interim relief is declined accordingly. 2010 (Application for interim relief & directions) The application is dismissed.
On 7 October 2016 the order records: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the relevant material. Exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned judgment is granted.
On 13 March 2018 the order records: File not received. The office report indicates that the Ld. Counsel for the parties have failed to file the statement of case within the statutory period. Filing of Statement of Case is not mandatory as per amended Supreme Court Rules, 2013. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Cour
On 19 April 2023 the order records: Shri Shekhar Naphade and Shri Vinay Navare, learned Senior Advocates, appearing on behalf of Respondent No.6-Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation have made a strong grievance that, despite the adverse order passed by the High Court and even thereafter, no stay has been granted by this Hon'ble Court mainly all the members
On 3 August 2023 the order records: Learned senior counsel for the appellants submitted that IA No.141335/2023 has been filed in CA Nos. 1537-1542/2017 along with the main matter i.e. C.A. No.7318/2010 and therefore the appellants are pressing the said application. However, we find that though there is a reference to the said application in the Office Re
On 6 August 2025 the order records: 101.5 ( C.A. No. 1537-1542/2017) De-tag to be heard separately. REST OF THE MATTERS :
On 2 April 2026 the order records: List on a Thursday before an appropriate Bench after obtaining necessary orders from Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India. (SNEHA DAS) (NIDHI MATHUR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

4 November 2011. List the applications on 21st November, 2011, when the applications for interim relief are coming up for consideration.
21 November 2011. We have heard learned Senior Counsel appearing for the parties. In our view, no case for grant of interim relief is made out. The interim relief is declined accordingly. 2010 (Application for interim relief & directions) The application is dismissed.
9 December 2013. Delay condoned. Leave granted.
7 October 2016. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the relevant material. Exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned judgment is granted.
7 February 2018. On mentioning, the matter is taken on Board. List the matter next week before the appropriate Bench as per the roster.
15 February 2018. Mr. Shekhar Napade, learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant, wants to amend the application. Needful be done within one week. List the matter after three weeks.
13 March 2018. File not received. The office report indicates that the Ld. Counsel for the parties have failed to file the statement of case within the statutory period. Filing of Statement of Case is not mandatory as per amended Supreme Court Rules, 2013. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Cour
5 February 2020. List I.A. Nos. 19971/2020, 19985/2020, 19988/2020 & 19989/2020 alongwith I.A. No. 72913/2017 in C.A. Nos. 1537 1542/2017 on 07.02.2020. (RAJNI MUKHI) (RENU KAPOOR) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER
7 February 2020. List the matters on 28.02.2020. (MEENAKSHI KOHLI) (RENU KAPOOR) AR-CUM-PS
26 February 2020. List I.A. Nos.19971/2020, 19985/2020, 19988/2020 & 19989/2020 in C.A. Nos.1537-1542/2017 on 28.02.2020.
5 March 2020. List on 16.03.2020.
11 August 2021. IA Nos 19971/2020, 19985/2020, 19988/2020 and 19989/2020 In Civil Appeal Nos 1537-1542 of 2017 1 Mr Abhinav Shrivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants states that he has instructions to apply for withdrawal of the interlocutory applications. 2 The Interlocutory Applications are dismissed as with
21 November 2022. The application being I.A. No. 104424 of 2021 seeking substitution is allowed. Cause titled be amended accordingly.
19 April 2023. Shri Shekhar Naphade and Shri Vinay Navare, learned Senior Advocates, appearing on behalf of Respondent No.6-Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation have made a strong grievance that, despite the adverse order passed by the High Court and even thereafter, no stay has been granted by this Hon'ble Court mainly all the members
26 July 2023. Not to be deleted from the notified date.
3 August 2023. Learned senior counsel for the appellants submitted that IA No.141335/2023 has been filed in CA Nos. 1537-1542/2017 along with the main matter i.e. C.A. No.7318/2010 and therefore the appellants are pressing the said application. However, we find that though there is a reference to the said application in the Office Re
21 September 2023. At request, list on 11.10.2023.
12 October 2023. At the request, list the matters on 08.11.2023.
8 November 2023. At request, list on 06.12.2023.
16 May 2024. As learned counsel for the respondent/Corporation has personal difficulty today, adjourned to 24.07.2024. All the Interlocutory Applications to be listed on the said date.
8 August 2024. List on 28.08.2024.
11 September 2024. List on 23.10.2024.
13 November 2024. List the matters in the third week of January, 2025 immediately after the fresh cases are heard.
16 January 2025. List on 23.01.2025 as item no.101.
23 January 2025. List on 06.02.2025 as item no.101. By then, learned counsel appearing for both sides to file common compilation consisting of the statutory provisions of law. Also, the propositions of law on which they rely upon and the copies of judgments, on which reliance is being placed, in the form of written submissions shall be
6 February 2025. Learned counsel for the appellant(s) submitted that copies of the compilation, statutes, documents etc. and written arguments have been served on learned counsel for the respondent(s) today. Hence, list on 20.02.2025.
20 February 2025. List on 06.03.23025 to be heard as Item No.101.
6 March 2025. At request, list on 27.03.2025 as item no.103.
3 April 2025. List these matters on 24.04.2025 in first six matters.
1 May 2025. List as item No. 101 on 08.05.2025.
The record also contains 9 further orders. Each file is listed on the Orders tab.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Kavin Gulati, Mr. R.N. Karanjawala, Ms. Nandini Gore, Mr. Debmalya Banerjee, Ms. Mehek Bhalla, Mr. Sunil Gupta, Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Mr. Tanmay Agarwal, Mr. Gaurav Agarwal, Mr. Harish N. Salve, Ms. Millie Thakkar, Ms. Sonia Nigam Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Shekhar Naphade, Mr. Vinay Navare, Mr. Keshav Ranjan, Ms. Abha R. Sharma, Ms. Taruna A. Prasad, Mr. Mike Prakash Desai, Mr. Sanjay V. Kharde, Ms. Asha G. Nair, Ms. Swati Sinha, Ms. Rajuta V. Masurerkar, Ms. Aparajita Singh, Mr. Harish N. Salve

Relief Sought & Granted

On 21 May 2026 the latest order on this record says: No orders.

The court record marks the case disposed. These order files do not contain a sentence that states the appeal or petition was allowed or dismissed, so that result is not restated here.

Subjects

Direction to public body Civil appeals Municipal law

Current position

DISPOSED · Latest recorded event 27 May 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 27 May 2026

Final disposition

DISPOSED

Important procedural note

Written only from 39 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added. 7 other files in the folder were left out.