- 6 July 2015. List I.A.No.3 of 2015 along with the main matter. (G.V.Ramana) (Vinod Kulvi) AR-cum-PS Asstt.Registrar Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Ramana Venkata Ganti Date: 2015.07.06 16:47:08 IST Reason:
- 17 November 2016. Delay condoned. Arguments heard.
- 2 January 2017. T.S. THAKUR, CJI. 1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties at considerable length. We have also been taken through relevant passages of the decision of this Court in Bangalore Water Supply & Sewarage Board etc. v. A.
- 12 September 2019. Four weeks' time is granted to the appellant to file an affidavit about the compliance of the order of the Labour Court.
- 3 October 2019. Not to be deleted from the date already notified i.e.
- 14 October 2019. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant prays for and is granted one week's time to file affidavit about the compliance of the order of the Labour Court with imposition of costs of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) which shall be deposited with the Supreme Court Employees' Mutual Welfare Fund immediately and f
- 18 November 2019. Heard learned counsel for the parties and carefully perused the averments made in the application. …………………..2/ Vide order dated 02.01.2017, the instant matter is referred to a larger Bench of Nine-Judges to answer the questions raised in the reference order dated 05.05.2005 passed by the Five Judges Bench in State of U
- 16 February 2026. 1. The instant appeals have been referred to a Nine-Judge Bench to consider the correctness of the judgment rendered by a Seven-Judge Bench in Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board vs. A. Rajappa, (1978) 2 SCC 213 and concomitantly to also re-consider the interpretation of the expression “industry” as defined in Se
- 17 March 2026. 1. We, at the outset, express our gratitude to Shri J.P. Cama, learned Senior Counsel and Shri P.S. Sengupta, learned Senior Counsel, who graciously agreed to assist this Court as A micus Curiae. 2. For further hearing, list tomorrow i.e., 18.03.2026.
- 18 March 2026. 1. Arguments heard, which remained inconclusive.
- 20 August 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 20 August 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Ms. Madhu Sikri, Mr. Sunil Gupta, Mr. Vivek Vishnoi, Mr. M. R. Shamshad, Mr. Aditya Samadar, Ms. Pinky Anand, Mrs. V.D. Makhija, Mrs. V. Mohana, Mr. D.N. Goburdhan, Mr. Vimla Sexena, Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, Mr. Karan Seth Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Mr. C.U. Singh, Mr. Jawahar Raja, Mr. Chinmay Kanojia, Mr. Gautam Bhatia, Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, Mr. Uday Manaktala, Mr. Dinesh Dwivedi, Mr. Preetesh Kapur, Mr. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, Mr. Manish Shankar Srivastava, Mr. Krishnam Misra
