- 7 November 2017. List the matter after four weeks.
- 8 January 2018. Issue notice.
- 9 May 2018. Four weeks time is given to the respondent No.1 to file the counter affidavit. As per postal tracking report notice issued to the Respondent No.2 has been received back with postal remarks “Insufficient address” and in respect of respondent No.3 has been received back undelivered. Hence, learned counsel for the petitio
- 29 August 2018. Four weeks' time, as a last chance, is given to respondent No.1 to file counter affidavit. Four weeks' time, as a last chance, is given to Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 09.05.2018 of this Court for effecting service upon respondent Nos.2 & 3.
- 20 November 2018. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 1 has not filed counter affidavit. Learned counsel for the petitioner has neither filed fresh particulars nor taken fresh steps in respect of unserved respondent nos. 2 and 3 despite court orders' dated 29th August, List the matter before the Hon'ble Judge-in-Chambers for further
- 29 April 2019. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to serve the notice on unserved respondent nos. 2 and 3 by dasti service. Four weeks' time is granted to the needful and file proof thereof.
- 12 July 2019. Respondent No. 1 has not filed counter affidavit. Service of notice is incomplete on Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
- 27 January 2020. Respondent No. 1 has already filed the Counter Affidavit. Ld. counsel for the petitioner shall file the affidavit in proof of dasti service of notice already issued to Respondent Nos.
- 23 June 2020. Respondent no.1 has already filed counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps alongwith fresh particulars to effect service on respondent nos.2 and 3 within two weeks time.
- 5 August 2020. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner not connected. Respondent no.1 has already filed counter affidavit.
- 9 December 2020. Finally, four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps and to furnish fresh particulars for effecting service on unserved respondent nos. 2 and 3 failing which the Special Leave Petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the court qua respondent nos. 2 and 3.
- 30 July 2024. 1. The dispute between the parties has been referred for determination to the Lok Adalat. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-Insurance company on our suggestions has agreed to pay a total compensation of Rs.
- 1 August 2024. 1. The dispute between the parties has been referred for determination to the Lok Adalat. 2. Since the matter could not be settled in Lok Adalat, list this matter before the Court.
- 26 November 2024. List on 02.12.2024.
- 4 February 2025. 1. Leave granted. 2. Hearing expedited.
- 1 September 2025. Respondent no.1 is duly represented. It has been submitted on behalf of respondent no.1 that counter affidavit has also been filed. Registry to verify.
- 23 August 2026. The dispute between the parties was referred for settlement before the Special Lok Adalat. However, no settlement could be arrived at in the Special Lok Adalat.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Hrishikesh Chitaley, Mr. Daksh Wadhawan, Mr. Hrishikesh S. Chitaley, Mr. Vijay Singh, Mr. Kaustubh D. Kadasne Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Mr. Mohit Singh, Mr. Arun Nagar, Mr. Abhishek Kumar Gola, Mr. Ramneek Singh, Mr. Yash Bhardwaj, Mr. Imran, Mr. Ujjwal Vashisht, Mr. Pearly Tyagi, Mr. Abhilasha Sinha, Mr. Devan Sharma, Ms. Shashi Prabha
