- 4 January 2018. Delay in refiling is condoned. Registry to proceed further.
- 12 January 2018. Issue notice. Until further orders, the operation of the impugned judgment and order dated 11.08.2017 passed by the High Court Of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur in D.B.S.A.W. No.645/2000, shall remain stayed.
- 8 March 2018. Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.10 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. As per postal tracking report notice issued to the respondent Nos. 2, 4, 6 and 8 could not be served and returned back undelivered. Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file th
- 23 April 2018. Service is complete on the respondent Nos.7 & 10, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Four weeks time as last chance is given to the Ld.counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 08.03.2018 of this Court in respect of the respondent Nos.2,4,6 & 8. As per postal tracking report
- 16 July 2018. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 7 and 10 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent Nos. 1, 3, 9 and 11 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of two weeks.
- 11 September 2018. Four weeks time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to file fresh particulars for issuance of notice to unserved Respondent No.2.
- 25 October 2018. Ld. Counsel for petitioner has taken fresh steps in respect of respondent No.2. Four weeks' time, as a last chance is given for filing fresh particulars, thereafter notice be issued to said respondent.
- 12 November 2018. Four weeks' time, as a last chance, is given to respondent Nos.1 and 3-8 to file counter affidavit. Service is complete qua respondent Nos.9,10 & 11 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
- 16 January 2019. List after two weeks.
- 25 March 2019. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted four weeks' time to submit fresh particulars of respondent no.2. Office to proceed thereafter.
- 5 August 2019. Learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out that Respondent No.2 Durga wife of Mr. Gyarsi has since been died and therefore petitioner seeks some time to substitute her legal heirs and that legal heirs are already on record. Let petitioner may file an appropriate application within two weeks.
- 25 October 2019. Perused the office report dated 19 th October, Delay in filing the application for deletion is condoned. Application seeking permission to delete the name of respondent No.2 from the array of parties is allowed at the risk of the petitioner.
- 2 February 2024. Leave granted. Hearing expedited.
- 25 June 2025. In view of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the respondents no. 9 to 11 seeking adjournment, list the matter after four weeks.
- 17 August 2026. 1. Ms. Maheranish Rein, learned counsel appears on behalf of the appellant and submits that she had filed vakalatnama on behalf of the appellant – Shri Satya Narayan Ji Maharaj through Moolchand Pujari. However, upon the death of Moolchand Pujari, his heirs/legal representatives have applied for substitution by engagin
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Maheravish Rein, Mr. Shamshrarish Rein, Mr. Aldanish Rein, Ms. Maheravish Rein, Mr. S. Rein, Ms. Shamshravish Rein, Ms. Maheranish Rein Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Ravinder Kumar Yadav, Ms. Arti Anupriya., Mr. Padhma Lakshmi, Mr. Vishal Meghwal, Mr. Milind Kumar, Mr. Vinay Mohan Sharma, Ms. Arti Anupriya, Mr. Baljeet Singh, Mr. Kartikey, Mr. Paras Juneja, Mr. Vineet Yadav, Mr. Amir Yadav
