- 17 April 2025. Delay condoned. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the amended clauses 10.1 and 10.2 of the Additional Agreement dated 15.12.2022 have been reproduced at page nos. 23 and 24 of the paper book of the present petition. He also submits that the High Court of Judicature at Bombay passed an anti-arbitration inju
- 14 August 2025. 1. The petitioner is permitted to serve the respondent through email. 2. List this matter after service is complete.
- 6 October 2025. Ld. Counsel for petitioner submits that today he will file proof of service via e-mail in respect of sole respondent, as was permitted by the Hon'ble Court's vide order dated 17.4.2025. If the same is filed today, list the matter before the Hon'ble Court.
- 1 April 2026. 1. Counsel for the petitioner seeks time as he wants to pursue an anti-arbitration injunction suit which is pending before the Bombay High Court. 2. Post the matter on 20.07.2026.
- 20 July 2026. List on 11.09.2026.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Nakul Mohta, Mr. Munaf Virjee, Ms. Misha Rohatgi, Ms. Jesse Cornelious, Mr. Ayush Kashyap, Ms. Sneha Menon, Mr. Tirtha Mukharjee, Mr. Sachin S., Mr. Tirtha Mukherjee, Mr. Rohit
