SEEMA CHAUDHARY Versus GIRIDHAR ARAMANE AND ORS. IN R.P.(C) No. - 1036/2023 (CONMT.PET.(C) 496/2024)

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it tofindcaseseasily@gmail.com— our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

If you find any discrepancy in any case record, please report it to findcaseseasily@gmail.com — our support team will be glad to review and fix it.

FindCasesEasilyFindCasesEasily.comAI-Powered Case Law & Court Intelligence

Supreme Court of India

Unified case view

0 cases

Sort

Reading · CONMT.PET.(C) 496/2024

Case Record

CONMT.PET.(C) 496/2024

SEEMA CHAUDHARY Versus GIRIDHAR ARAMANE AND ORS. IN R.P.(C) No. - 1036/2023

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI · HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE V. MOHANA

CONMT.PET.(C)Contempt Civil Contempt Revision Taxation

22 PDF renditions· 22 distinct judicial orders· 22 verified locally

Save

8Important Paragraphs
6Legal Principles
12Authorities
47Similar Cases

Case record

Research

What Happened

SEEMA CHAUDHARY Versus GIRIDHAR ARAMANE & ORS.. CONMT.PET.(C) 496/2024 in the Supreme Court of India, CNR SCIN010202532024. Status on the court record: PENDING. This page is written from 22 order document(s) downloaded for this case, dated 9 July 2024 to 8 May 2026.

On 9 July 2024 the order records: 1 Issue notice, returnable in two weeks. 2 The personal presence of the respondents-contemnor is dispensed with for the present.
On 18 October 2024 the order records: 1 The Union of India shall produce before this Court the original records pertaining to the consideration of the candidature of the petitioner for the grant of Permanent Commission. 2 List the Petition on 21 October 2024.
On 29 November 2024 the order records: 1. The arguing counsel for the petitioner is not present. 2. List on 11.12.2024 along with all other matters of similar nature.
On 20 May 2025 the order records: 1. We have heard the arguments at length. The service record of the petitioner has been perused. The Board proceedings for the grant of P.C. have also been minutely seen. 2. On the request of Dr. R. Bala, learned senior counsel, representing the respondents, post the matter for appropriate orders on 15.07.2025.
On 15 July 2025 the order records: 1. With reference to the observations made in our order dated 20.05.2025, learned Attorney General for India seeks and is granted three weeks' more time to have an appropriate administrative decision and for filing additional documents. 2. Post the matter on 18.08.2025.

Issues Before Court

The orders on this record do not frame issues for decision.

Procedural History

9 July 2024. 1 Issue notice, returnable in two weeks. 2 The personal presence of the respondents-contemnor is dispensed with for the present.
18 October 2024. 1 The Union of India shall produce before this Court the original records pertaining to the consideration of the candidature of the petitioner for the grant of Permanent Commission. 2 List the Petition on 21 October 2024.
21 October 2024. List the Petition on 25 October 2024.
25 October 2024. 1 List the Contempt Petition after Diwali holidays.
29 November 2024. 1. The arguing counsel for the petitioner is not present. 2. List on 11.12.2024 along with all other matters of similar nature.
21 January 2025. List on 04.03.2025 (NMD).
26 March 2025. Upon being mentioned by the petitioner, list on 25.04.2025.
25 April 2025. List on 05.05.2025.
5 May 2025. List on 20.05.2025 (NMD).
20 May 2025. 1. We have heard the arguments at length. The service record of the petitioner has been perused. The Board proceedings for the grant of P.C. have also been minutely seen. 2. On the request of Dr. R. Bala, learned senior counsel, representing the respondents, post the matter for appropriate orders on 15.07.2025.
15 July 2025. 1. With reference to the observations made in our order dated 20.05.2025, learned Attorney General for India seeks and is granted three weeks' more time to have an appropriate administrative decision and for filing additional documents. 2. Post the matter on 18.08.2025.
25 August 2025. Not to be deleted from the notified date, i.e., 29.08.2025.
29 August 2025. List on 15.09.2025.
15 September 2025. List on 23.09.2025(NMD).
7 October 2025. List on 14.10.2025(NMD).
14 October 2025. List on 25.11.2025.
5 January 2026. List on 20.01.2026(NMD).
10 February 2026. Post the matter on 23.02.2026.
23 February 2026. List on 09.03.2026.
9 March 2026. List immediately after the pronouncement of judgment in C.A. No.14681/2024.
13 April 2026. List on 14.05.2026.
8 May 2026. List on 25.05.2026.
Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.

Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Devadatt Kamat, Mr. Shivendra Singh, Mr. Ajay Desai, Mr. Bikram Dwivedi, Ms. Sampriti Baksi, Mr. Javedur Rahman, Ms. Prakriti Rastogi, Mr. Ajay Tewari, Ms. Dilmrig Nayani, Ms. Rekha Palli, Mr. Devdatt Kamat, Ms. Bhavya Sharma Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, Mr. Anmol Chandan, Mr. Vatsal Joshi, Mr. Annirudh Sharma Ii, Ms. Kiran Bala Sahay, Mr. Ishaan Sharma, Mr. Sarthak Karol, Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Ameyavikrama Thanvi, Mr. Kartikey Aggarwal, Mr. R. Bala

Relief Sought & Granted

On 8 May 2026 the latest order on this record says: List on 25.05.2026.

The court record used for this archive still shows the case as not disposed. No final relief is added beyond the words of the orders above.

Subjects

Contempt Civil Contempt Revision Taxation

Current position

PENDING · Latest recorded event 8 May 2026

Latest development

Latest recorded event 8 May 2026

Next hearing

15 Sept 2025

Important procedural note

Written only from 22 Supreme Court order file(s) for this case. No headnote or citation was added.