- 12 September 2022. Issue notice on the application for stay and also on the Appeals.
- 6 July 2023. Ld. counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars in respect of unserved respondent no.1. Service is complete on respondent nos. 2 and 3 but none has entered appearance.
- 9 August 2023. Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed a letter furnishing five different addresses in respect of respondent no.1 but spare copy(s) has/have not been filed. Be filed within two weeks as final opportunity. Notice thereafter be issued. Service is complete on respondent nos. 2 and 3 but none has entered appearance.
- 23 November 2023. Despite due service on respondent nos.2 and 3, there is no appearance. Two weeks time, is granted to Ld. counsel for the petitioner, to take appropriate steps, for effecting service upon respondent no.1 or file application for substituted service through paper publication, as requested today.
- 24 January 2024. Despite service of notice on respondent Nos.2 and 3, there is no appearance on their behalf. Appellant has filed application for substituted service in respect of Respondent No.1.
- 11 March 2024. Despite service of notice on respondent Nos.2 and 3, there is no appearance on their behalf. Ld. Counsel for appellant shall within a period of two weeks file proof of publication in respect of respondent No.1.
- 3 May 2024. Despite service of notice on respondent Nos. 1 to 3, there is no appearance on their behalf. Hence, the matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.
- 16 April 2025. This statutory appeal is admitted for final hearing as notice has been issued on 12th September, 2022. List on 21st August, 2025.
- 21 August 2025. List the matter tomorrow i.e.22.08.2025.
- 22 August 2025. 1. These Appeals were notified yesterday for hearing. 2. None appeared on behalf of the respondent when these appeals were taken up for hearing.
- 10 September 2025. List on 16-9-2025 as first matter on the Board.
- 16 September 2025. 1. Arguments concluded. 2. Judgment reserved.
- 17 March 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- 17 March 2026. Order on the record. The operative text could not be read.
- Counsel named on these orders, not a complete vakalatnama, include the advocates listed below.
Advocates — Appellants: Mr. Arvind P. Datar, Mr. Pratap Venugopal, Ms. Surekha Raman, Mr. Akhil Abraham Roy, Mr. Vijay Valsan, Mr. Prashant Kumar Nair, Mr. Abhishek Anand, Mr. Shreyash Kumar, Mr. Amarjit Singh Bedi, Mr. Dhaval Mehrotra, Ms. Aditi Desai, Mr. Pratap Venogopal Advocates — Respondents: Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, Mr. Vivek Rajan D.P, Mr. Hemant Gupta, Mr. Vivek Rajan D.b, Mr. Mahfooz A. Nazki, Mr. Vivek Rajan D.b., Ms. Nazarat Fatima, Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan, Mr. Justice
